Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 2 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textYin, Yue; Shavelson, Richard J. – Center for Research on Evaluation Standards and Student Testing CRESST, 2004
In the first part of this paper we discuss the feasibility of using Generalizability (G) Theory to examine the dependability of concept map assessments and to design a concept map assessment for a particular practical application. In the second part, we apply G theory to compare the technical qualities of two frequently used mapping techniques:…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Generalizability Theory, Concept Mapping, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed
Direct linkPorter, Andrew C.; Smithson, John; Blank, Rolf; Zeidner, Timothy – Applied Measurement in Education, 2007
With the exception of the procedures developed by Porter and colleagues (Porter, 2002), other methods of defining and measuring alignment are essentially limited to alignment between tests and standards. Porter's procedures have been generalized to investigating the alignment between content standards, tests, textbooks, and even classroom…
Descriptors: Teaching Methods, Computer Uses in Education, Instructional Innovation, Guidance Programs
