Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Practitioners | 312 |
Administrators | 154 |
Teachers | 114 |
Policymakers | 29 |
Researchers | 12 |
Students | 5 |
Media Staff | 2 |
Counselors | 1 |
Support Staff | 1 |
Location
Australia | 6 |
United Kingdom | 5 |
New York | 3 |
Florida | 2 |
Texas | 2 |
Africa | 1 |
China | 1 |
Costa Rica | 1 |
Georgia | 1 |
Germany | 1 |
Illinois (Chicago) | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Higher Education Act 1965 | 1 |
Pell Grant Program | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Newell, Susan; Price, James H. – Health Education (Washington D.C.), 1983
A study of criteria for promotion, tenure, and merit in college departments of health education revealed that fewer than half the colleges responding had a written policy on faculty advancement and that more than half the department chairpersons reported dissatisfaction with their institutions' policies. Suggested criteria are listed. (PP)
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, College Faculty, Department Heads, Evaluation Criteria

Muchinsky, Paul M. – Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 1995
Examines military and industrial research on peer assessment and discusses relevance to peer review of college teaching. Gives special attention to practical issues in assessing reliability and validity of peer evaluations, and discusses three characteristics of academic institutions (personal teaching styles/definition of "peer"/nature of…
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Business Administration, College Faculty, College Instruction

Keig, Larry W.; Waggoner, Michael D. – Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 1995
Examines use of collaborative college faculty peer review for instructional improvement. Establishes rationales for formative evaluation of teaching, peer review in instructional improvement, and comprehensive faculty evaluation that includes peer review. Examines roles faculty might play in assessing colleagues' teaching; describes five methods…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Cooperation, Evaluation Methods

Kumaravadivelu, B. – Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 1995
Proposes a broader concept of college faculty peer evaluation, in which perspectives of teacher, learner, and observer are considered. Argues that three basic principles (intention/interpretation, advisement/appraisement, acceptability/accessibility) must necessarily and minimally guide peer evaluation. Presents a four-part, multidimensional peer…
Descriptors: Classroom Observation Techniques, College Faculty, College Instruction, Departments

Cohen, Peter A. – Journal of Dental Education, 1991
Of 40 course directors leading the same dental school course for 4 years, 9 sought professional development assistance after receiving student course evaluations. When compared with a matched group of faculty not seeking consultation, this group received significantly higher student ratings in the next three years. (MSE)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Dental Schools, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation

Murray, John P. – Innovative Higher Education, 1995
Teaching portfolios provide college faculty and department chairs with the means to recognize good teaching and promote the values of the discipline. Portfolio content should include information on what is taught and why, documentation of teaching strategies, evidence of teaching effectiveness, and a teaching improvement plan. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods

Thompson, H. R.; And Others – Higher Education Research and Development, 1990
Faculty self-appraisal workshops instituted at MacQuarie University (Australia) in response to a call for increased faculty self-evaluation is seen as a useful format for faculty development. The workshops occur at the departmental level, where it is easiest to integrate curriculum design, assessment policies, academic content, and teaching…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Faculty, Departments, Evaluation Methods

Scott, Sally S. – Teacher Education and Special Education, 1992
A national survey of higher education special education faculty (n=243) found respondents to be involved in formal support programs and other activities for college students with disabilities on a widespread basis but with minimal time commitments. Results suggest realigning institutional reward systems to address faculty interests and campus…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Students, Disabilities, Faculty Development
McLendon, Sandra F. – 1992
This paper reports on a study designed to assist in the development of an incentive pay system at Kentucky's Sue Bennett College that would be utilized to recognize merit and performance through increases in faculty salaries. Study procedures to determine the system's elements involved a literature search, a solicitation of input from the Faculty…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Compensation (Remuneration), Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Hayes, Darwin L. – 1987
A graduate student internship program in teaching composition at Brigham Young University (Utah) is described. Interns are trained for five advanced English courses: critical and interpretive writing, critical writing for elementary education majors, writing about literature, factual and scientific writing, and technical writing. The first interns…
Descriptors: Advanced Courses, Church Related Colleges, College English, Faculty Evaluation
Langley, Harry M. – 1984
In spring 1981, a need was identified for the improvement of the faculty evaluation system at Brunswick Junior College (BJC). A committee, formed to study methods of faculty evaluation, recommended an evaluation system based on Modified Management by Objectives (MMBO). Subsequent to approval by the college administration, the new system was…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Community Colleges, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation
Barber, Larry – 1983
To make merit-pay plans work, a district's teacher-evaluation system must be both summative and formative--evaluating both for teacher outcomes and for progressive improvement. Only peer-mediated self-appraisal systems seem able to meet such a challenge. Fairly rewarded merit-pay plans depend on accurate teacher evaluations. However, teacher…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Faculty Evaluation, Formative Evaluation, Merit Pay
Harrington, Sue Anne; And Others – 1987
Developed by the Criteria and Procedures for Tenure, Promotion and Salary Increases Review Committee of the University of Oklahoma Libraries, this document is the result of the committee's charge to review the current criteria for teaching, research, and service; consider strengthening the criteria; and recommend any changes that should be made.…
Descriptors: Academic Rank (Professional), College Libraries, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Carroll, J. Gregory; Goldberg, Stella R. – 1985
A consultation method for analyzing and improving college instruction is described, along with views about the program by 10 faculty participants. The method employs two consultants and is based solely on individual consultation, teaching observations, and detailed critique. An initial meeting with the instructor addresses the individual's…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Consultation Programs, Faculty Evaluation
Seldin, Peter – 1984
A guide to understanding and improving faculty evaluation procedures at all types of colleges and universities is presented. The causes of today's crisis in higher education and survival strategies are reviewed, and the search for solvency is related to major changes in assessing faculty performance. The proliferation of court challenges to…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Court Litigation, Educational Change, Employment Practices