Descriptor
Periodicals | 3 |
Reputation | 3 |
College Administration | 2 |
College Choice | 2 |
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Mass Media | 2 |
Public Relations | 2 |
Administrators | 1 |
College Faculty | 1 |
Comprehensive School Health… | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Chaney, J. Don | 1 |
Eddy, James M. | 1 |
Gilbert, Jersey | 1 |
Machung, Anne | 1 |
Morse, Robert J. | 1 |
O'Rourke, Thomas W. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Administrators | 3 |
Practitioners | 3 |
Researchers | 1 |
Students | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Machung, Anne – Change, 1998
The "U.S. News and World Report" rankings of colleges do not affect institutions equally; the schools impacted most are those that have the most to lose because they benefit from, even rely on, the rankings for prestige and visibility. The magazine relies on the rankings for substantial sales revenues, and has garnered considerable power…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Choice, Comparative Analysis, Higher Education
Chaney, J. Don; Eddy, James M.; O'Rourke, Thomas W. – American Journal of Health Education, 2004
The purpose of this study was to replicate the Notaro, O'Rourke, and Eddy study to rank doctoral programs in health education, incorporating comments from professionals in health education to enhance the ranking study methods. This study used a multiple set of variables weighted by scholars and leaders in the field of health education. These…
Descriptors: Comprehensive School Health Education, Doctoral Programs, Health Education, Evaluation Criteria

Morse, Robert J.; Gilbert, Jersey – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1995
Two representatives of popular magazines that publish controversial rankings of colleges and universities respond to criticism of the rankings. Issues addressed include the need for third-party comparisons, the importance of institutional reputation, cooperation with the higher education community, changing methodology, data integrity, reader…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Choice, Comparative Analysis, Higher Education