Descriptor
Decision Making | 4 |
Legislators | 4 |
Public Opinion | 2 |
State Legislation | 2 |
Activism | 1 |
Administrators | 1 |
Advocacy | 1 |
Boards of Education | 1 |
Change Strategies | 1 |
Citizen Participation | 1 |
College Graduates | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Population Research and… | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 3 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 4 |
Policymakers | 3 |
Researchers | 2 |
Administrators | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Templin, Vicki L. – Population Research and Policy Review, 1987
Reports on a study designed to define the demographic and career characteristics and the values of lawmakers in the United States and Canada. Discusses how this information was used to predict policy decisions. (TW)
Descriptors: Data Collection, Decision Making, Demography, Foreign Countries
Seiter, Margaret M. – 1984
This guide for changing public opinion concerning physical education is divided into four sections: The first, "Setting the Stage" tells how the various governments are organized, and the processes which turn public opinion into public policy. Future trends in the federal, state, and local role in funding public education are discussed. An…
Descriptors: Activism, Advocacy, Change Strategies, Citizen Participation
Marshall, Catherine; And Others – 1986
Individual members of state legislatures wield the greatest influence in state level policy formation. This was one of the findings of a study that identified the power and influence context of state-level policymaking. Data were gathered from six states (Arizona, California, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Illinois) using an instrument…
Descriptors: Administrators, Boards of Education, Decision Making, Educational Policy
Doble, John; Komarnicki, Mary – 1986
This report for the National Academy of Engineering's Office of Public Awareness represents the second phase of an examination of public opinion about engineering and technology. This document presents an analysis of six qualitative, focused group discussions or focus groups. Five of these groups were college educated Americans and one was…
Descriptors: College Graduates, Decision Making, Engineering, Focus Groups