Descriptor
Costs | 3 |
Higher Education | 3 |
Retirement Benefits | 3 |
College Administration | 2 |
College Faculty | 2 |
Personnel Policy | 2 |
Trend Analysis | 2 |
Administrators | 1 |
Age Discrimination | 1 |
Aging in Academia | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Academe | 1 |
Business Officer | 1 |
CUPA Journal | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Administrators | 3 |
Practitioners | 3 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Hamermesh, Daniel S.; Woodbury, Stephen A. – Academe, 1991
This article explains why college faculty benefit by taking large portions of their compensation in fringe benefits, presents data showing trends in the provision of fringe benefits to college and university employees, and suggests that academic supply and demand conditions during the 1990s may lead to resumption of the upward trend in…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Compensation (Remuneration), Costs, Fringe Benefits
Knopf, Winfield G. – Business Officer, 1994
A number of economic and social factors suggest that this is an appropriate time for colleges and universities to review employee retirement plans. Information that employees should have for retirement planning is reviewed, and basic principles for institutions to use in selecting a pension company are outlined. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Administration, Comparative Analysis, Competition, Costs

Schoenfeld, Clay – CUPA Journal, 1993
Changes in retirement patterns at colleges and universities can be expected because of demographic reasons and because of federal and state legislation uncapping mandatory retirement. Institutional policies that will encourage reluctant older faculty to retire need to address the three fundamental components of successful employee retirement: (1)…
Descriptors: Administrators, Age Discrimination, Aging in Academia, College Administration