Descriptor
| Administrative Policy | 2 |
| Case Studies | 2 |
| Cheating | 2 |
| Discipline Policy | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Admission Criteria | 1 |
| Codes of Ethics | 1 |
| College Administration | 1 |
| College Admission | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Educational Trends | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Administrators | 2 |
| Practitioners | 2 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedBurgar, Paul – Research in Higher Education, 1994
A Total Quality Management (TQM) approach to enforcing an admissions rule was taken in one master's degree program in lieu of punishing students for infraction. Prevention became possible only after TQM techniques revealed the causes of rule violation. Follow-up shows no new rule infractions for several academic terms. (MSE)
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, Admission Criteria, Case Studies, Cheating
Peer reviewedPavela, Gary; McCabe, Donald – Planning for Higher Education, 1993
Principles for developing college academic honor codes include developing clear, specific definitions of dishonesty and applying them uniformly; using peer education and influence; appealing to students' personal integrity; reducing temptation to cheat; encouraging active student participation and critical thinking; imposing reasonable but strict…
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, Case Studies, Cheating, Codes of Ethics
