Descriptor
| Federal Aid | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Grantsmanship | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Information Dissemination | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| Public Agencies | 1 |
| Research Projects | 1 |
| Resource Allocation | 1 |
| Surveys | 1 |
Source
| Higher Education | 1 |
Author
| Wood, Fiona Q. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Administrators | 1 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
| Australia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedWood, Fiona Q.; And Others – Higher Education, 1992
A survey investigated the Australian federal research grant process from the perspectives of unsuccessful 1991 applicants (n=222) from four universities. Findings include a number of limitations in the peer review process and information dissemination by the funding agency and raise questions about external evaluator selection. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Federal Aid, Foreign Countries, Grantsmanship, Higher Education
