Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 state, "No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance". This provision paved the way for student-initiated lawsuits claiming discrimination in the area of intercollegiate athletics and resulted in a great expansion in opportunities for women and girls to participate in athletics. Thirty-six years after the passage of Title IX, it seems reasonable to assess the status of gender equity in intercollegiate athletics. A substantial body of scholarly books and articles exists on the subject at four-year colleges and universities. Interestingly enough, little work explores two-year colleges. To address this deficiency, this chapter draws from a variety of sources. The authors' primary source is Castaneda's 2004 dissertation, which used data from the Equity and Athletic Disclosure Act (EADA) and the National Center for Education Statistics' Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) to analyze gender equity in three compliance areas critical for assessing Title IX: compliance and accommodation of student interest and ability, athletic financial assistance, and other program areas such as coaching and recruitment. To further illuminate gender equity issues, the 2005 Basic Classifications of Institutions of Higher Education from the Carnegie Foundation are used to highlight differences and similarities among and between types of community colleges. The chapter begins with a literature review, a description of Castaneda's methodology, and a presentation of data related to gender equity. It concludes with suggestions for improved policy and practice to promote better compliance with Title IX and more equitable community college athletic programs. (Contains 3 tables.)