Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
College Environment | 4 |
Ethics | 4 |
Governance | 3 |
Governing Boards | 3 |
Higher Education | 3 |
Organizational Climate | 3 |
Trustees | 3 |
Cheating | 2 |
College Administration | 2 |
Change | 1 |
Civil Rights | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Two Year Colleges | 1 |
Audience
Policymakers | 4 |
Administrators | 1 |
Location
California | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
California Education Code | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Cuninggim, Merrimon – AGB Reports, 1989
At Southern Methodist University, the athletic problems were merely the tip of the iceberg. The real scandal was the way the university was organized and run. Some implications for American higher education in general are presented. (MLW)
Descriptors: Change, Cheating, College Administration, College Athletics
Perlman, Daniel H. – AGB Reports, 1992
Responding to diminished public esteem means intensifying efforts to create an ethical college climate. Educators face these ethical challenges: managing institutions ethically; teaching ethics to students, both in class and in dealing with student behavior in an educational setting; and serving as ethical leaders for the wider community. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Environment, Decision Making, Ethics, Governance
Ylvisaker, Paul N. – Trusteeship, 1994
In responding to political, social, and ethical issues, college trustees have three essential responsibilities: (1) to examine critical trends and influences outside the institution; (2) to translate this knowledge into institutional policy; and (3) to monitor the institution's social, political, and ethical performance through recurrent…
Descriptors: College Environment, College Role, Ethics, Governance
Academic Senate for California Community Colleges, 2007
This Academic Senate paper is in response to two resolutions from Fall 2005 concerning academic dishonesty. One resolution, 14.02, "Student Cheating," sought clarification on a System Office legal position that limits the ability of local faculty to fail a student for a single incident of academic dishonesty, and pending the result of…
Descriptors: Civil Rights, Discipline, Cheating, Distance Education