Teacher competency testing for the purpose of screening persons prior to state certification continues to be on the upswing in the United States. Many states have implemented paper-pencil tests, most of which were prepared by Educational Testing Service and National Evaluation Systems. Problem areas to consider when certification tests are used to mandate the quality of teacher education programs include: (1) A wedge can develop between the institution and the state department of education. (2) Teaching toward passing the test may occur when a university's instructional program is being evaluated. (3) Excellent programs are not necessarily reflected by test results. (4) Quality may not truly be improved. Requiring certification tests in hiring procedures includes these issues: (1) Shortages in certain teaching fields can develop where many candidates are not passing tests. (2) Certification complications can result, causing delay for applicants. (3) It is uncertain that, with the use of tests, more competent teachers will be hired. (4) Minorities and protected groups may be disproportionately screened from teaching. Testing programs do not necessarily create a positive national image for a state. Negative images can develop within a state when, for example, some institutions display better test performances than others. Recommendations include exploration and projection of issues and problems. If the decision is made to test, then it should be done "to the minimum." Twenty-seven references are included. (CJH)