Descriptor
| Case Studies | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Faculty Development | 1 |
| Faculty Evaluation | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| Program Effectiveness | 1 |
| Program Evaluation | 1 |
| Tenured Faculty | 1 |
Source
| Academe | 1 |
Author
| Johnson, Sandra | 1 |
| Wesson, Marianne | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Administrators | 1 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedWesson, Marianne; Johnson, Sandra – Academe, 1991
An evaluation of the University of Colorado's posttenure faculty peer review process found that, although the process was successful in identifying faculty whose efforts might be reinvigorated through faculty development, the resources to effect change had seldom been forthcoming. The most useful aspect of the review was the most neglected. (MSE)
Descriptors: Case Studies, College Faculty, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development
