NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 15 results Save | Export
Nanmathi Manian; Wendy McColskey; Kim Benton; Noah Lipshie – National Comprehensive Center, 2021
School communities in both urban and rural settings need trauma-informed (TI) supports; however, the adversities experienced and access to student supports may be unique to rural school communities. In addition, the contextual challenges experienced by rural schools and communities, as well as the strengths that can be drawn from them, will…
Descriptors: Trauma, Rural Schools, Child Development, School Districts
Prewitt, Kenneth, Ed.; Schwandt, Thomas A., Ed.; Straf, Miron L., Ed. – National Academies Press, 2012
"Using Science as Evidence in Public Policy" encourages scientists to think differently about the use of scientific evidence in policy making. This report investigates why scientific evidence is important to policy making and argues that an extensive body of research on knowledge utilization has not led to any widely accepted explanation…
Descriptors: Public Policy, Policy Formation, Scientists, Evidence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fox, Mary Frank – Journal of Higher Education, 1994
The role of editors and peer reviewers in detecting and sanctioning scientific misconduct is analyzed, structural problems inherent in the process are examined, and best means of enabling peer and editorial roles in correction of misconduct are discussed. It is argued that the review process plays a limited corrective role. (MSE)
Descriptors: Editors, Fraud, Higher Education, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Frankel, Mark S. – SRA Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 1991
A discussion of resource allocation for scientific research identifies the ethical principles underlying the present debate and begins to construct a framework for evaluating various resource allocation proposals. The intent is to promote greater consideration of the link between ethics and science resource allocations. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Ethics, Higher Education, Program Evaluation, Research Administration
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hackett, Edward J. – Journal of Higher Education, 1994
Some explanations for scientific misconduct are examined, including those based on theories of individual psychopathology, anomie, and alienation. An alternative explanation, drawing on the concept of social control, is presented, and implications for research and policy are examined. (MSE)
Descriptors: Alienation, Fraud, Higher Education, Individual Psychology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Chemical and Engineering News, 1984
Highlights findings from National Science Foundation's National Survey of Academic Research Instruments and Instrumentation which examined the amount, condition, and cost of existing equipment systems for 1982 in computer sciences, physical sciences, and engineering. Indicates that one-fourth of the equipment is classified as obsolete by…
Descriptors: College Science, Computer Science, Engineering, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Irvine, George W. – SRA Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 1992
The following administrative aspects of scientific experimentation with human subjects are discussed: the definition of human experimentation; the distinction between experimentation and treatment; investigator responsibility; documentation; the elements and principles of informed consent; and the administrator's role in establishing and…
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, Administrator Role, Ethics, Experiments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Johnston, Ron – Australian Universities' Review, 1990
The increasing competitiveness in international industry has raised new demands for effective research management, resulting in an array of science policy techniques and extensive experimentation. However, the new techniques must be tested, developed, and refined and applied with considerable caution before science policy can be based on them…
Descriptors: Competition, Educational Policy, Foreign Countries, Higher Education
Archambault, Jean-Marie – International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education, 1985
While the model of peer evaluation has limits in its use in research resource allocation, it is vital for the equilibrium of the science structure and the university's mission, as evidenced in the University of Quebec at Trois Rivieres's pilot exercise in research evaluation. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: College Administration, College Role, Financial Support, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Price, Alan R. – Journal of Higher Education, 1994
The evolution of the definition of scientific misconduct in two federal agencies, the Public Health Service/National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation, is examined, and the resulting regulatory definitions are contrasted. Further change is anticipated as the definitions are criticized and challenged. (MSE)
Descriptors: Definitions, Federal Government, Federal Regulation, Fraud
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kyvik, Svein – Higher Education Management, 1993
A survey of tenured faculty in four Norwegian universities investigated publication and scientific productivity patterns in a three-year period. Analysis of results suggests underlying reasons for differences between individuals, age groups, and gender groups and implications for administrative policy to support productivity. (MSE)
Descriptors: Age Differences, College Faculty, Comparative Analysis, Faculty Publishing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gering, Thomas; Schmied, Helwig – Higher Education Management, 1993
Comparison of patent policies of universities in France, Great Britain, Germany, and the United States suggests that, although U.S. institutions' policies are far better developed, the European universities are capable of the same success, even within existing administrative frameworks. Economic, scientific, and national development benefits are…
Descriptors: College Administration, Comparative Analysis, Cost Effectiveness, Costs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fox, Mary Frank; Braxton, John M. – Journal of Higher Education, 1994
A discussion of misconduct in scientific research looks at the roles of several segments of the scientific community (federal government, universities, scholarly journals, and individual scientists) in exercising control of misconduct. Limitations of their roles and overall implications for policy are examined. (MSE)
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, Federal Regulation, Fraud, Government Role
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lafollette, Marcel C. – Journal of Higher Education, 1994
In the U.S. Congress, attention to scientific fraud and misconduct has involved extensive use of oversight authority. Because scientists and universities have failed to respond promptly to calls for self-regulation, Congress has imposed formal regulations and favors increased scrutiny of research and a reassessment of university-government-science…
Descriptors: College Role, Federal Government, Federal Regulation, Fraud
St. John, Mark; Helms, Jenifer V.; Castori, Pam; Hirabayashi, Judy; Lopez, Laurie; Phillips, Michelle – Inverness Research, 2009
The documents enclosed in this report provide a comprehensive and systematic review of the progress made in developing a network organization capable of supporting nanoscience education for the public on a national scale. There is a logic to the studies that were done and to the reports that are included in this notebook. The following are the…
Descriptors: Workshops, Leadership, Administrators, Scientists