Descriptor
Author
Maassen, Peter A. M. | 2 |
Bergman, Maia I. | 1 |
Vroeijenstijn, Ton I. | 1 |
Zijderveld, Diederick C. | 1 |
van Overbeek, Marjan | 1 |
van der Weiden, Marianne J. H. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 5 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Administrators | 7 |
Practitioners | 7 |
Researchers | 2 |
Location
Netherlands | 7 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Vroeijenstijn, Ton I. – Higher Education Research and Development, 1990
In response to changing government philosophy concerning higher education, including increased institutional autonomy alongside greater pressure for accountability and internal renewal, Dutch universities have developed a system for external quality assessment under the aegis of the Association of Dutch Universities. Its evolution and results to…
Descriptors: Accountability, College Administration, College Outcomes Assessment, Educational Quality

Maassen, Peter A. M. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1998
The Dutch quality improvement model in higher education has successfully maintained the delicate balance between internal improvement and external accountability, but the faculty's clear ownership of the system (as contrasted with government ownership in some nations) has made continuous quality improvement a dominant feature of the current Dutch…
Descriptors: Accountability, College Administration, College Faculty, College Outcomes Assessment

Zijderveld, Diederick C. – Higher Education Management, 1997
Describes the system of external institutional evaluation in Netherlands universities, distinguishing between the organizations conducting the assessment itself and the follow-up. The primary assessing organization is a private one, funded and governed by the 14 universities, and uses discipline-based assessment teams. The follow-up assessment is…
Descriptors: Accountability, Agency Role, College Administration, College Outcomes Assessment

van Overbeek, Marjan – Higher Education Management, 1997
Reports on a Dutch study examining qualitative aspects of internationalization in Dutch higher education institutions, and examines the ways Dutch institutions evaluate Dutch students' academic experiences abroad. Raises the question of whether existing systems meet stated standards for quality assurance. Makes some recommendations for…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, College Administration, College Outcomes Assessment, Educational Quality
Maassen, Peter A. M.; Bergman, Maia I. – 1993
Given the growing need to look across national borders in order to be prepared for global challenges confronting higher education in the coming decades, it can be expected that institutional administrators in the U.S. and other western countries will need information on the quality and efficiency of their activities, including an international…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Comparative Education, Doctoral Programs, Educational Quality
Association of Universities in the Netherlands. – 1990
This document presents the most recently revised guide to the protocol and review process for external review of universities in the Netherlands. Part 1 consists of a description of the review process, an explanation of the protocol, and the roles of the parties involved, with further discussion of the actions of the visiting committee, the…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Accreditation (Institutions), Accrediting Agencies, College Faculty

van der Weiden, Marianne J. H. – Higher Education Management, 1995
First, the role of the association of universities in the Netherlands in external institutional evaluation is examined. Then, three basic tenets of program assessment are discussed: (1) university programs must be of academic quality; (2) program content must not be too compressed; and (3) programs should be challenging for students. (MSE)
Descriptors: Accountability, College Administration, Educational Quality, Evaluation Criteria