Descriptor
| Ambiguity | 1 |
| Cheating | 1 |
| Codes of Ethics | 1 |
| College Curriculum | 1 |
| College Instruction | 1 |
| Ethical Instruction | 1 |
| Ethics | 1 |
| Fraud | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Peer Relationship | 1 |
| Research Administration | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Research Management Review | 1 |
Author
| Lowman, Robert P. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Administrators | 1 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedLowman, Robert P. – Research Management Review, 1997
Programs that teach scientific ethics must maintain vigilance against scientific misconduct; prepare scientists to deal with ethical ambiguity; and stress the importance of consultation and consensus, adherence to accepted standards of evidence, and commitment to due process using procedures established in advance. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Ambiguity, Cheating, Codes of Ethics, College Curriculum
