NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)7
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 21 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Amit, Adi; Sagiv, Lilach – Journal of Career Assessment, 2013
We present the PreferenSort, a career counseling instrument that derives counselees' vocational interests from their preferences among occupational titles. The PreferenSort allows for a holistic decision process, while taking into account the full complexity of occupations and encouraging deliberation about one's preferences and acceptable…
Descriptors: Career Counseling, Vocational Interests, Interest Inventories, Preferences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dik, Bryan J.; Strife, Samantha Roberts; Hansen, Jo-Ida C. – Career Development Quarterly, 2010
This study examined the relationship between Holland type (Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, and Conventional; Holland, 1959, 1997) congruence and incongruence (i.e., lack of ft between an occupation's 3-letter Holland code and a person's lowest 3 Holland interest types) and tested whether incongruence predicts unique…
Descriptors: Job Satisfaction, Vocational Interests, Career Choice, Congruence (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Armstrong, Patrick Ian; Fouad, Nadya A.; Rounds, James; Hubert, Lawrence – Journal of Career Assessment, 2010
Research on group differences in interests has often focused on structural hypotheses and mean-score differences in Holland's (1997) theory, with comparatively little research on basic interest measures. Group differences in interest profiles were examined using statistical methods for matching individuals with occupations, the C-index, Q…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Careers, Ethnic Groups, Interest Inventories
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tracey, Terence J. G. – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2008
The present study examined the relation between individual cognitive structure and several key career decision variables. Specifically, in a sample of college students enrolled in a career development class, the usage of the RIASEC (Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, and Conventional) circumplex (adherence) was examined as…
Descriptors: Self Efficacy, Career Choice, Cognitive Structures, Career Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gasser, Courtney E.; Larson, Lisa M.; Borgen, Fred H. – Journal of Career Assessment, 2007
This is the first article evaluating the concurrent validity of the 2005 Strong Interest Inventory (SII). The Basic Interest Scales (BISs) were substantially revised to reflect the changing workplace, so such an update is particularly important. Concurrent validity of the 41 content scales in the SII was examined for differentiating 31 college…
Descriptors: Student Interests, Majors (Students), Measures (Individuals), Interest Inventories
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Chartrand, Judy M.; Borgen, Fred H.; Betz, Nancy E.; Donnay, David – Journal of Career Assessment, 2002
Interests and self-efficacy are related constructs that contribute to a better understanding of career goals. The correlation between interests and self-efficacy as measured by the Skills Confidence Inventory and Strong Interest Inventory are very stable; concurrent administration yields a comparison of levels of interest and confidence from…
Descriptors: Career Choice, Interest Inventories, Self Efficacy, Vocational Interests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Eggerth, Donald E.; Andrew, Michael E. – Journal of Career Assessment, 2006
The concept of congruence between person and occupation lies at the core of Holland's (1997) theory of career types. The C index is arguably the best available method for comparing the congruence of two Holland code profiles. The C index reflects the theorized hexagonal structure of the Holland RIASEC model, is sensitive to code ordering, and is…
Descriptors: Theories, Coding, Computation, Occupational Information
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Luzzo, Darrell Anthony; Day, Michael Andrew – Journal of Career Assessment, 1999
College students were assigned to three groups: Strong Interest Inventory (SII) plus social cognitive group feedback (n=52), SII only (n=22), and controls (n=25). The feedback group had higher career decision-making self-efficacy and more differentiated career beliefs than the SII-only group. Both SII groups were more likely to see the…
Descriptors: Career Choice, Decision Making, Feedback, Self Efficacy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hansen, Jo-Ida C.; Lee, W. Vanessa – Journal of Career Assessment, 2007
The validity of scores on the Strong Interest Inventory (SII) for Asian American college students has not been thoroughly investigated. This study examined the evidence of validity of the SII Occupational Scale scores for predicting college major choices of Asian American women and men and White women and men. The sample included 186 female and…
Descriptors: Majors (Students), Females, College Students, Whites
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lindley, Lori D.; Borgen, Fred H. – Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2000
The relationship between the personal style scales of the Strong Interest Inventory and the Big Five model of personality was investigated with 740 undergraduates and a cross-validation sample of 321. No significant gender differences were observed. Personal style scales indicating living and working preferences were correlated with personality…
Descriptors: Career Choice, Life Style, Personality Traits, Sex Differences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Donnay, David A. C.; Borgen, Fred H. – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1999
Examines the incremental validity of the General Confidence Themes of the Skills Confidence Inventory as measures of vocational self-efficacy in identifying tenured and satisfied membership in 21 occupational groups. Results replicate earlier findings that self-efficacy and interest form similar structures. Results also demonstrate the explanatory…
Descriptors: Career Choice, Career Exploration, Self Efficacy, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hesketh, Beryl; And Others – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1995
Used the concept of fuzzy variable to develop new sex-type, prestige, and Holland interest scales from the Occupational Scales of the Strong Interest Inventory. Describes intercorrelations among three measures of Holland themes and measures of sex type and prestige. Comments on potential counseling and research uses for the new measures. (JPS)
Descriptors: Career Choice, Higher Education, Interests, Research Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Katz, Louise; Joyner, John W.; Seaman, Nancy – Journal of Career Assessment, 1999
Students completed either the Strong Interest Inventory (n=114) or Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (n=108), both (n=99), or none (n=106). Twelve weeks after interpretation, those who completed both showed more change, specificity, or certainty in their career goal. The Myers-Briggs proved as helpful as Strong in career decision making. (SK)
Descriptors: Career Choice, College Students, Decision Making, Goal Orientation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Donnay, David A. C. – Career Development Quarterly, 1997
Reviews the history of the Strong Interest Inventory and the legacy of its creator, E. K. Strong Jr. Focuses on Strong's development of the inventory method and use of criterion-related scale development. Outlines trends in content-related scale developments, innovations in the inventory, and future directions for predicting career behavior. (RJM)
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, Attitude Measures, Career Choice, Career Counseling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Uffelman, Rachel A.; Subich, Linda Mezydlo; Diegelman, Nathan M.; Wagner, Kimberly S.; Bardash, Rebekah J. – Journal of Career Assessment, 2004
To compare the effects of three different modes of interest assessment on career decision-making self-efficacy, 81 career-undecided college students participated in one of the following four conditions: an assessment intervention using the Strong Interest Inventory, an intervention using one of two methods of applying the Self-Directed Search, or…
Descriptors: Intervention, Self Efficacy, Interest Inventories, Career Choice
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2