Descriptor
| Interrater Reliability | 3 |
| Meta Analysis | 3 |
| Test Use | 3 |
| Test Validity | 3 |
Source
| Psychological Assessment | 3 |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Rorschach Test | 3 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedMeyer, Gregory J. – Psychological Assessment, 1997
In reply to criticism of the Rorschach Comprehensive System (CS) by J. Wood, M. Nezworski, and W. Stejskal (1996), this article presents a meta-analysis of published data indicating that the CS has excellent chance-corrected interrater reliability. It is noted that the erroneous assumptions of Wood et al. make their assertions about validity…
Descriptors: Interrater Reliability, Meta Analysis, Test Use, Test Validity
Peer reviewedWood, James M.; Nezworski, M. Teresa; Stejskal, William J. – Psychological Assessment, 1997
G. Meyer (1997) attempts to refute the present authors' criticisms of the interrater reliability of the Rorschach Comprehensive System (CS) but misrepresents their position and offers a flawed meta-analysis in support of his own. Rorschach proponents need to undertake high-quality replicated studies of CS reliability and validity. (SLD)
Descriptors: Interrater Reliability, Meta Analysis, Test Use, Test Validity
Peer reviewedMeyer, Gregory J. – Psychological Assessment, 1997
Replies to Wood et al. and documents limitations of their conclusions about the Rorschach Comprehensive System (CS), supporting Meyer's own meta-analysis, which finds adequate interrater reliability for the CS. (SLD)
Descriptors: Interrater Reliability, Meta Analysis, Test Use, Test Validity
