Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Grade 10 | 2 |
| Mathematics Achievement | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Academic Persistence | 1 |
| Algebra | 1 |
| At Risk Students | 1 |
| Attendance | 1 |
| Barriers | 1 |
| COVID-19 | 1 |
| Cognitive Ability | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Auchstetter, Amelia | 1 |
| Bos, Johannes M. | 1 |
| Cassasanto-Ferro, Julia | 1 |
| Cor, M. Ken | 1 |
| Cui, Ying | 1 |
| Dhillon, Sonica | 1 |
| Graczewski, Cheryl | 1 |
| Kitmitto, Sami | 1 |
| Leighton, Jacqueline P. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Education Level
| Grade 10 | 2 |
| High Schools | 2 |
| Grade 9 | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| New York | 2 |
| Arizona | 1 |
| California | 1 |
| District of Columbia | 1 |
| Illinois | 1 |
| Maine | 1 |
| Maryland | 1 |
| Massachusetts | 1 |
| Minnesota | 1 |
| Tennessee | 1 |
| Texas | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Preliminary Scholastic… | 2 |
| SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textBos, Johannes M.; Graczewski, Cheryl; Dhillon, Sonica; Auchstetter, Amelia; Cassasanto-Ferro, Julia; Kitmitto, Sami – American Institutes for Research, 2022
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the implementation and impacts of the Building Assets, Reducing Risks (BARR) model in its first year of implementation in 66 schools across the U.S. and to document scale-up progress during the Investing in Innovation (i3) grant period (2017-2021). The impact evaluation included 21,529 9th grade students…
Descriptors: Program Effectiveness, Grade 9, Secondary School Students, Secondary School Teachers
Peer reviewed
Direct linkLeighton, Jacqueline P.; Cui, Ying; Cor, M. Ken – Applied Measurement in Education, 2009
The objective of the present investigation was to compare the adequacy of two cognitive models for predicting examinee performance on a sample of algebra I and II items from the March 2005 administration of the SAT[TM]. The two models included one generated from verbal reports provided by 21 examinees as they solved the SAT[TM] items, and the…
Descriptors: Test Items, Inferences, Cognitive Ability, Prediction
