The "Examination of the Validity and Reliability of the Kansas Clinical Assessment Tool" study explored the validity and reliability of the Kansas Clinical Assessment Tool (K-CAT), a newly developed tool for assessing the performance of teacher candidates. The study found that cooperating teachers reported that the K-CAT accurately represented existing teaching performance standards (face validity). Two skilled raters found that the content of the K-CAT was mostly aligned to existing teaching performance standards (content validity). In addition, K-CAT scores for the same teacher candidate, provided by cooperating teachers and supervising faculty, were positively related (convergent validity). This document presents the following appendixes that accompanies the study: (1) Brief literature review; (2) Data and methods; (3) Detailed analyses; (4) The Kansas Clinical Assessment Too; (5) Crosswalk between the Kansas Clinical Assessment Tool and existing standards; (6) Sample alignment protocol; and (7) Sample cognitive interview protocol. [For the full report, see ED613622. For the Study Brief, see ED613624. For the Study Snapshot, see ED613623.]