Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Scoring | 2 |
| Writing Tests | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Automation | 1 |
| College Entrance Examinations | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| English (Second Language) | 1 |
| Essay Tests | 1 |
| Essays | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| ETS Research Report Series | 2 |
Author
| Haberman, Shelby J. | 1 |
| Ramineni, Chaitanya | 1 |
| Trapani, Catherine S. | 1 |
| Williamson, David M. | 1 |
| Yao, Lili | 1 |
| Zhang, Mo | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Praxis Series | 2 |
| Graduate Record Examinations | 1 |
| Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textYao, Lili; Haberman, Shelby J.; Zhang, Mo – ETS Research Report Series, 2019
Many assessments of writing proficiency that aid in making high-stakes decisions consist of several essay tasks evaluated by a combination of human holistic scores and computer-generated scores for essay features such as the rate of grammatical errors per word. Under typical conditions, a summary writing score is provided by a linear combination…
Descriptors: Prediction, True Scores, Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring
Ramineni, Chaitanya; Trapani, Catherine S.; Williamson, David M. – ETS Research Report Series, 2015
Automated scoring models were trained and evaluated for the essay task in the "Praxis I"® writing test. Prompt-specific and generic "e-rater"® scoring models were built, and evaluation statistics, such as quadratic weighted kappa, Pearson correlation, and standardized differences in mean scores, were examined to evaluate the…
Descriptors: Writing Tests, Licensing Examinations (Professions), Teacher Competency Testing, Scoring
