Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Curriculum Based Assessment | 1 |
| Cutting Scores | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Improvement | 1 |
| Mathematics Skills | 1 |
| Mathematics Tests | 1 |
| Middle School Students | 1 |
| Predictor Variables | 1 |
| Risk | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| School Psychology Review | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Wisconsin | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Measures of Academic Progress | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkKlingbeil, David A.; Maurice, Samuel A.; Van Normann, Ethan R.; Nelson, Peter M.; Birr, Chris; Hanrahan, Amanda R.; Schramm, Amber L.; Copek, Rebecca A.; Carse, Sara A.; Koppel, Rachael A.; Lopez, Abigail L. – School Psychology Review, 2019
Common universal screening methods for determining math risk in middle school grades may not result in optimal diagnostic accuracy. We evaluated current screening practices and several potential modifications for predicting math proficiency on an end-of-year state test in a suburban school district. Previously, the district used the Measures of…
Descriptors: Mathematics Tests, Screening Tests, Achievement Tests, Middle School Students
