Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
Beach, Richard | 1 |
Bellamy, G. Thomas | 1 |
Eck, James H. | 1 |
Lukhele, Robert | 1 |
Reynolds, David | 1 |
Schaffer, Eugene | 1 |
Sireci, Stephen G. | 1 |
Stringfield, Sam | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Collected Works - General | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Administrators | 1 |
Policymakers | 1 |
Location
California | 1 |
Massachusetts | 1 |
Texas | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
General Educational… | 3 |
National Assessment of… | 2 |
ACT Assessment | 1 |
Program for International… | 1 |
Progress in International… | 1 |
Trends in International… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Eck, James H.; Bellamy, G. Thomas; Schaffer, Eugene; Stringfield, Sam; Reynolds, David – Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning (McREL), 2011
The authors of this monograph assert that by assisting school systems to more closely resemble "high reliability" organizations (HROs) that already exist in other industries and benchmarking against top-performing education systems from around the globe, America's school systems can transform themselves from compliance-driven…
Descriptors: Best Practices, School Effectiveness, Program Effectiveness, Commercialization
Beach, Richard – Online Submission, 2011
This paper analyzes the influence of three different learning paradigms for learning literacy--formalist, cognitive-processing, and literacy practices--on the implementation of the Common Core State Standards. It argues that the Common Core State Standards are based largely on a formalist paradigm as evident in the emphasis on teaching text…
Descriptors: Text Structure, Models, State Standards, Educational Change
Lukhele, Robert; Sireci, Stephen G. – 1995
Free-response (FR) item formats, such as essay questions, are popular in educational assessment. The criticisms against FR items are that they are more expensive to score, take up more testing time, provide less content coverage, and are less reliable than multiple-choice (MC) items. For these reasons, FR items are often combined with MC items.…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Essay Tests, Item Response Theory, Multiple Choice Tests