Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Learning Activities | 2 |
| Physics | 2 |
| Science Tests | 2 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| Active Learning | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Discussion Groups | 1 |
| High School Students | 1 |
| Learner Engagement | 1 |
| Learning Theories | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Henderson, J. Bryan | 1 |
| Pawl, Andrew | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| High Schools | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Force Concept Inventory | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkPawl, Andrew – Physics Teacher, 2020
Examination of my students' individual gains on the Force Concept Inventory (FCI) over the course of several semesters led to the realization that student pretest knowledge on certain key questions appeared to be correlated to enhanced gain during the class. Acting under the hypothesis that early intervention aimed at helping the class perform…
Descriptors: Scientific Concepts, Physics, Science Instruction, Teaching Methods
Henderson, J. Bryan – Harvard Educational Review, 2019
Peer Instruction, a pedagogy utilizing handheld classroom response technology to promote student discussion, is one of the most popular research-based instructional practices in STEM education. Yet, few studies have shed theoretical light on how and why Peer Instruction is effective. In this article, J. Bryan Henderson explores the Peer…
Descriptors: Active Learning, Peer Teaching, Learning Activities, Learning Theories
