Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Content Area Reading | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Evaluative Thinking | 1 |
| Logical Thinking | 1 |
| Metacognition | 1 |
| Reading Comprehension | 1 |
| Reading Strategies | 1 |
| Reading Tests | 1 |
| Science Education | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Grantee Submission | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Illinois (Chicago) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| ACT Assessment | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full text
Direct linkWiley, Jennifer; Jaeger, Allison J.; Taylor, Andrew R.; Griffin, Thomas D. – Grantee Submission, 2018
The main goal of the present research was to test whether the presence of analogies would affect the relative accuracy of metacognitive judgments about learning from expository science texts, and whether any effect would depend on the type of cues that readers used as the basis for their judgments of comprehension. In a series of experiments,…
Descriptors: Logical Thinking, Metacognition, Reading Comprehension, Accuracy
