Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Comparison of syndromic surveillance and hospital discharge data for unintentional drowning in metropolitan Houston, Texas, USA
  1. Nicholas Peoples1,
  2. Jennifer L Jones1,
  3. Elizabeth A Camp1,
  4. Ned Norman Levine2,
  5. Rohit P Shenoi3
  1. 1 Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
  2. 2 Ned Levine and Associates, Houston, Texas, USA
  3. 3 Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Rohit P Shenoi; rshenoi{at}bcm.edu

Abstract

Background Syndromic surveillance, which provides real-time data, may provide timely drowning surveillance compared with hospital discharge data where the release of data may be delayed. We compared data on hospital visits for unintentional drowning identified in hospital discharge and syndromic surveillance data sets for accuracy and completeness.

Methods We compared data for hospital visits for unintentional drowning identified in the Texas Health Care Information Collection hospital discharge and syndromic surveillance data sets for metropolitan Houston, Texas, USA from 2019 to 2021. Hospital visits included emergency department-only visits and hospital admissions. We compared time-series visualisation of hospital visits between data sets. Injury burden, demographics and intercounty distribution of drowning patients were compared using the Pearson correlation coefficient for continuous data and the Pearson χ2 goodness-of-fit test for categorical data.

Results We identified 860 hospital discharge visits and 929 syndromic surveillance visits (quarterly median (IQR): 64.0 (26.8–117.5); 54.5 (28.0–132.3), respectively) for unintentional drowning. Time-series visualisation showed a high correlation between syndromic surveillance and hospital discharge visits (correlation coefficient: 0.93 (95% CI: 0.77 to 0.98)). There were small differences by race, ethnicity and county for all ages and for paediatrics and large differences by sex for all ages in the number of unintentional drowning hospital visits identified within the data sets.

Conclusions Regional unintentional drowning burden and trends are highly correlated between syndromic surveillance and hospital discharge data. Small differences by race, ethnicity and county and large differences by sex in the number of unintentional drowning hospital visits were identified between data sets. Syndromic surveillance is useful for real-time surveillance of unintentional drowning.

  • Surveillance
  • Drowning
  • Descriptive Epidemiology

Data availability statement

No data are available. Data are available from the primary sources.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

No data are available. Data are available from the primary sources.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Collaborators NA.

  • Contributors NP conceptualised and designed the study, drafted the initial manuscript and contributed substantially to its review and revision for important intellectual content. JLJ coordinated and supervised data collection and transfer from other sites, contributed substantially to the review of the manuscript and its revision for important intellectual content. EAC provided statistical expertise on study design and analysed the data, drafted the initial manuscript and contributed substantially to the review of the manuscript and its revision for important intellectual content. NNL analysed the data, contributed substantially to the review of the manuscript and its revision for important intellectual content. RPS conceptualised and designed the study, undertook acquisition and management of data, drafted the initial manuscript and contributed substantially to its review and revision for important intellectual content. RS is the guarantor of the manuscript.

  • Funding This study was funded by a grant from the CDC: U01 CE003504-01. The funding agency had no role in analysis, reporting and interpretation of data.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.