Article
What we can learn from coursework patterns about improving the undergraduate curriculum
James L. Ratcliff,
James L. Ratcliff
James L. Ratcliff is professor of higher education and director of the Center for the Study of Higher Education at Pennsylvania State University, University Park. He also is executive director of the National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment, and editor of the Journal of General Education.
Search for more papers by this authorJames L. Ratcliff,
James L. Ratcliff
James L. Ratcliff is professor of higher education and director of the Center for the Study of Higher Education at Pennsylvania State University, University Park. He also is executive director of the National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment, and editor of the Journal of General Education.
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
A new analytical model links student assessment with curriculum reform.
References
- Astin, A. W. “The Methodology of Research on College Impact, Part I.” Sociology of Education, 1970a, 43, 223–254.
- Astin, A. W. “The Methodology of Research on College Impact, Part 2.” Sociology of Education, 1970b, 43, 437–450.
- Astin, A. W. Assessment for Excellence: The Philosophy and Practice of Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. New York: Macmillan, 1991.
- Banta, T., and others. Bibliography of Assessment Instruments. Knoxville, Tenn.: Center for Assessment Research and Development, University of Tennessee, 1990.
- Benbow, C. P., and Stanley, J. C. “Differential Course-Taking Hypothesis Revisited.” American Educational Research Journal, 1983, 20 (4), 469–573.
- Bergquist, W. H., Gould, R. A., and Greenberg, E. M. Designing Undergraduate Education: A Systematic Guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1981.
- Biglan, A. “The Characteristics of Subject Matter in Different Academic Areas.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973, 57 (3), 195–203.
- Cheney, L. V. 50 Hours: A Core Curriculum for College Students. Washington, D.C.: National Endowment for the Humanities, 1989.
- Committee on Redefining the Meaning and Purpose of Baccalaureate Degrees. Association of American Colleges. Integrity in the College Curriculum: A Report to the Academic Community. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Colleges, 1985.
- Eaton, J. S. The Unfinished Agenda: Higher Education and the 1980s. New York: Macmillan, 1991.
- El-Khawas, E. Campus Trends, 1988. Higher Education Panel Reports, No. 77. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1988.
- El-Khawas, E. Campus Trends, 1990. Higher Education Panel Reports, No. 80. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1990.
-
Ewell, P.
“Assessment and Public Accountability: Back to the Future.”
Change,
1991,
23,
12–17.
10.1080/00091383.1991.9940589 Google Scholar
- Fuhrman, B., and Grasha, A. A Practical Handbook for College Teachers. Boston: Little, Brown, 1983.
- Gaff, J. G. General Education Today: A Critical Analysis of Controversies, Practices, and Reforms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1983.
-
Gaff, J. G.
“General Education at the Decade's End: The Need for a Second Wave of Reform.”
Change,
1989,
21,
11–19.
10.1080/00091383.1989.9939862 Google Scholar
- Jones, E. A., and Ratcliff, J. L. “ Effective Coursework Patterns and Faculty Perceptions of the Development of General Learned Abilities.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Portland, Oregon, November 1990a.
- Jones, E. A., and Ratcliff, J. L. “ Is a Core Curriculum Best for Everybody? The Effect of Different Patterns of Coursework on the General Education of High and Low Ability Students.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, April 1990b.
- Jones, E. A., and Ratcliff, J. L. “Which General Education Curriculum Is Better: Core Curriculum or the Distributional Requirement?” Journal of General Education, 1991, 40, 69–101.
- Lorr, M. Cluster Analysis for Social Scientists: Techniques for Analyzing and Simplifying Complex Blocks of Data. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1983.
- Pallas, A. M., and Alexander, K. L. “Sex Differences in Quantitative SAT Performance: New Evidence on the Differential Coursework Hypothesis.” American Educational Research Journal, 1983, 20 (2), 165–182.
- Pascarella, E. T., and Terenzini, P. T. How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991.
- Pike, G. R., and Phillippi, R. H. “Generalizability of the Differential Coursework Methodology: Relationships Between Self-Reported Coursework and Performance on the ACT-COMP Exam.” Research in Higher Education, 1989, 30 (3), 245–260.
- Prather, J. E., and Smith, G. Faculty Grading Patterns. Atlanta: Office of Institutional Planning, Georgia State University, 1976a.
- Prather, J. E., and Smith, G. Undergraduate Grades by Course in Relation to Student Ability Levels, Programs of Study, and Longitudinal Trends. Atlanta: Office of Institutional Planning, Georgia State University, 1976b.
- Ratcliff, J. L. The Effect of Differential Coursework Patterns on General Learned Abilities of College Students: Application of the Model to a Historical Database of Student Transcripts. Report on Task No. 3 for the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Contract No. OERI-R-86–0016. Ames:: Iowa State University, 1987.
- Ratcliff, J. L. “ The Development of a Cluster Analytic Model for Determining the Associated Effects of Coursework Patterns on Student Learning.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, April 1988.
- Ratcliff, J. L. “ Determining the Effects of Different Coursework Patterns on the General Student Learning at Four Colleges and Universities.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, March 1989.
- Ratcliff, J. L., and Jones, E. A. “ General Learning at a Women's College.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Portland, Oregon, November 1990.
- Ratcliff, J. L., and Jones, E. A. “ Are Common Course Numbering and a Core Curriculum Valid Indicators in the Articulation of General Education Credits Among Transfer Students?” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, April 1991.
- Ratcliff, J. L., Jones, E. A., and Hoffman, S. Handbook on Linking Assessment and General Education. University Park: National Center for Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment, Pennsylvania State University, 1992.
- Ratcliff, J. L., and others. Development and Testing of a Cluster-Analytic Model for Identifying Coursework Patterns Associated with General Learned Abilities of College Students: Final Report on Stanford University Samples Nos. 1–2. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Contract No. OERI-R-86-0016. Ames:: Iowa State University, 1990a.
- Ratcliff, J. L., and others. Development and Testing of a Cluster-Analytic Model for Identifying Coursework Patterns Associated with General Learned Abilities of College Students: Final Report on Ithaca College Samples Nos. 1–2. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Contract No. OERI-R-86-0016. Ames:: Iowa State University, 1990b.
- Ratcliff, J. L., and others. Development and Testing of a Cluster-Analytic Model for Identifying Coursework Patterns Associated with General Learned Abilities of College Students: Final Report on Ithaca College Sample No. 3. Prepared for the Exxon Education Foundation. University Park: Center for the Study of Higher Education, Pennsylvania State University, 1990c.
- Ratcliff, J. L., and others. Development and Testing of a Cluster-Analytic Model for Identifying Coursework Patterns Associated with General Learned Abilities of College Students: Final Report on Ithaca College Samples Nos. 1–2. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Contract No. OERI-R-86-0016. University Park: Center for the Study of Higher Education, Pennsylvania State University, 1990d.
-
Romesburg, H. C.
Cluster Analysis for Researchers.
Belmont, Calif.:
Lifelong Learning,
1984.
10.2307/1955988 Google Scholar
- Rudolph, F. Curriculum: A History of the American Undergraduate Course of Study Since 1636. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1977.
- Sloan, D. “Harmony, Chaos, and Consensus: The American College Curriculum.” Teachers College Record, 1971, 73, 221–251.
- Study Group on the Conditions of Excellence in American Higher Education. National Institute of Education. Involvement in Learning: Realizing the Potential of American Higher Education. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1984.
- Veysey, L. Stability and Experiment in the American Undergraduate Curriculum. In C. Kaysen (ed.), Content and Context: Essays on College Education. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1973.
- Zemsky, R. Structure and Coherence: Measuring the Undergraduate Curriculum. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Colleges, 1989.
