Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Protocol
Effects of different brisk walking intensities on adherence and cardiorespiratory endurance of cardiac rehabilitation among patients with CHD after PCI: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
  1. Jing Jing Piao1,
  2. Boya Wan1,2,
  3. Haomei Zhao1,
  4. Zhiyang Shang3,
  5. Lingjun Yan1,4,
  6. Zhina Hao5,
  7. Yonghong Wang1,
  8. Yanqing Zhang1,
  9. Yanmei Gu1,6
  1. 1School of Nursing, Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang, China
  2. 2Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China
  3. 3Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei, China
  4. 4The Third Hospital Of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, China
  5. 5Hospital of Stomatology Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
  6. 6Key Laboratory for HealthCare with Chinese Medicine of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang, China
  1. Correspondence to Yanmei Gu; guyanmei{at}hebcm.edu.cn

Abstract

Introduction Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a critical treatment for patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention. Unfortunately, participation and adherence of CR are unexpectedly poor. This study aims to test whether low-intensity or medium-intensity brisk walking is more helpful in improving early attendance, adherence and physical results.

Methods and analysis This randomised controlled study will compare the effects of low-intensity and medium-intensity brisk walking to improve adherence and cardiopulmonary endurance. Participants will be randomly allocated to low-intensity or medium-intensity groups and will be followed-up for 8 weeks. Primary and secondary outcome data will be collected at baseline and at 2, 4 and 8 weeks. Primary outcomes measure changes in oxygen consumption (VO2) peak value (mL/kg/min), as well as adherence. Secondary outcomes include changes in body mass index, oxygen pulse, maximal metabolic equivalent, breathing reserve, vital capacity, ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 s to forced vital capacity, Δoxygen consumption/Δwork rate (ΔVO2/ΔWR), minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production and self-efficacy.

Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval and informed consent form have been obtained from the Ethics Committee of Hebei General Hospital (approval number: NA-2021–03). The study background and main objective, as well as potential benefits and risks, will be fully explained to the participants and their families. Findings from this study will be published on academic journals in Chinese or in English for widespread dissemination of the results

Trial registration number ChiCTR2100047568.

  • CARDIOLOGY
  • Coronary heart disease
  • REHABILITATION MEDICINE
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • JJP and BW are joint first authors.

  • JJP and BW contributed equally.

  • Contributors YG and JJP designed the study. BW, ZH, LY, YW and YZ organise the WeChat group and collect clinical data. ZS and HZ are in charge of the data management and statistical analyse. JJP drafted the manuscript. YG contributed to the interpretation of the results and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content and approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. YG is the study guarantor.

  • Funding This study is funded by the Social Science Fund Project of Hebei Province (HB19SH009).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research. Refer to the Methods section for further details.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.