Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Protocol
Summarising and synthesising regression coefficients through systematic review and meta-analysis for improving hypertension prediction using metamodelling: protocol
  1. Mohammad Ziaul Islam Chowdhury1,
  2. Iffat Naeem1,
  3. Hude Quan1,
  4. Alexander A Leung2,
  5. Khokan C Sikdar3,
  6. Maeve O'Beirne4,
  7. Tanvir C Turin4
  1. 1 Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  2. 2 Department of Medicine, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  3. 3 Health Status Assessment, Surveillance and Reporting, Public Health Surveillance and Infrastructure, Population, Public and Indigenous Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  4. 4 Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Mohammad Ziaul Islam Chowdhury; mohammad.chowdhury{at}ucalgary.ca

Abstract

Introduction Hypertension is one of the most common medical conditions and represents a major risk factor for heart attack, stroke, kidney disease and mortality. The risk of progression to hypertension depends on several factors, and combining these risk factors into a multivariable model for risk stratification would help to identify high-risk individuals who should be targeted for healthy behavioural changes and/or medical treatment to prevent the development of hypertension. The risk prediction models can be further improved in terms of accuracy by using a metamodel updating technique where existing hypertension prediction models can be updated by combining information available in existing models with new data. A systematic review and meta-analysis will be performed of hypertension prediction models in order to identify known risk factors for high blood pressure and to summarise the magnitude of their association with hypertension.

Methods and analysis MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and grey literature will be systematically searched for studies predicting the risk of hypertension among the general population. The search will be based on two key concepts: hypertension and risk prediction. The summary statistics from the individual studies will be the regression coefficients of the hypertension risk prediction models, and random-effect meta-analysis will be used to obtain pooled estimates. Heterogeneity and publication bias will be assessed, along with study quality, which will be assessed using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool checklist.

Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not required for this systematic review and meta-analysis. We plan to disseminate the results of our review through journal publications and presentations at applicable platforms.

  • hypertension
  • statistics & research methods
  • risk management
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors contributed to this work. MZIC and TCT contributed to the conception and design of the review. MZIC and IN read and screened abstracts and titles of potentially relevant studies. MZIC and IN read the retained papers and were responsible for extracting data and rating their quality independently. MZIC drafted the paper and IN, HQ, AAL, KCS, MOB and TCT critically reviewed it and suggested amendments prior to submission. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript and take responsibility for the integrity of the reported findings.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.