The not so independent tobacco experts
BMJ 2014; 348 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2908 (Published 25 April 2014) Cite this as: BMJ 2014;348:g2908- Meg Carter, freelance journalist
- 1Bath, UK
- meg{at}megcarter.com
Transparency in lobbying was one of the hoped for outcomes from the UK government’s controversial lobbying act, due for royal assent this year.1 This legislation has been criticised for, among other things, its narrow definition of lobbying and a new register of declared interests that would cover only a fraction of lobbyists. Now attention is settling on a sector beyond the bill’s remit: the media.
“All too often the media perpetuates the illusion that lobbyists—think tanks, especially—are independent sources of information and ideas,” said Tamasin Cave, director of the transparency campaigning group Spinwatch. “While I understand the need for opinion and comment, media organisations do their audiences a disservice by not explaining these contributors’ financial backing or vested interests.”
Her comments follow the launch of a petition on change.org by the author and Guardian columnist George Monbiot, urging the BBC always to disclose the relevant financial interests of the people it interviews.2 Monbiot’s call has come after several articles in which he criticised the BBC for letting think tanks argue the tobacco companies’ case against the introduction of plain packaging.3 …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£50 / $60/ €56 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.