Research Article

in

Differential Vocational Rehabilitation Service Patterns Related to the Job Retention and Job-Seeking Needs of Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis

Have access already?

Get access to this article:

Or get access to the particular issue:

Or get access to the entire journal:

Advertisement

Abstract

The experience of living with multiple sclerosis (MS) can have a profound effect on employment. The impact of MS is a complex interaction of personal, medical, functional, financial, and psychosocial variables that ultimately results in up to 80% of persons with MS leaving their jobs within 10 years of their diagnosis. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the employment status of applicants with MS who were seeking services from state vocational rehabilitation (VR) agencies could be classified based on the type of services provided. A quantitative descriptive research design employing discriminant analysis (DA) was used to determine differential services received by employed and unemployed applicants with MS. Findings indicate that persons with MS who were employed at application were more likely to receive services geared toward career stabilization (i.e., assistive technology/accommodation services, counseling and guidance, and cognitive retraining-type rehabilitative services). Conversely, the unemployed applicant group had a higher propensity to receive services focused on job placement (i.e., job readiness, job seeking, and job placement services). Although a disparity persisted between the average worker in the United States and the outcomes achieved by VR service recipients regarding weekly wages and hours, services provided by the state-federal VR program reduce this disparity. In addition, the return on investment (ROI) associated with providing services to persons with MS was calculated as providing an $8 return for every dollar spent. Persons with MS employed at application had an ROI of more than $10 for every dollar spent. Implications for persons with MS, rehabilitation counselors, health care professionals, and policymakers are provided.

Article usage
Article Usage
Period Abstract Full PDF Total
Feb 2025 5 0 0 5
Jan 2025 25 0 0 25
Dec 2024 16 0 0 16
Nov 2024 0 1 0 1
Oct 2024 3 0 0 3
Sep 2024 7 0 0 7
Aug 2024 166 0 0 166
Jun 2024 9 0 0 9
May 2024 196 0 0 196
Apr 2024 31 0 0 31
Mar 2024 12 1 1 14
Feb 2024 6 0 0 6
Jan 2024 22 0 0 22
Dec 2023 9 0 0 9
Nov 2023 17 0 0 17
Oct 2023 12 0 0 12
Sep 2023 7 0 0 7
Aug 2023 2 0 0 2
Jul 2023 3 0 0 3
Jun 2023 9 0 0 9
May 2023 16 0 0 16
Apr 2023 8 0 0 8
Mar 2023 8 1 1 10
Feb 2023 4 0 0 4
Jan 2023 9 0 0 9
Dec 2022 4 0 0 4
Nov 2022 15 0 0 15
Oct 2022 7 0 0 7
Sep 2022 13 0 0 13
Aug 2022 6 0 0 6
Jul 2022 9 0 1 10
Jun 2022 8 0 0 8
May 2022 68 0 0 68
Apr 2022 2 0 0 2
Mar 2022 8 0 0 8
Feb 2022 24 0 0 24
Dec 2021 8 0 0 8
Nov 2021 5 0 0 5
Oct 2021 4 0 0 4
Sep 2021 2 0 0 2
Aug 2021 754 0 0 754
Jun 2021 2 0 0 2
May 2021 2 0 0 2
Apr 2021 19 0 0 19
Mar 2021 6 0 0 6
Feb 2021 20 0 0 20
Jan 2021 4 0 0 4
Dec 2020 3 0 0 3
Nov 2020 31 0 0 31
Oct 2020 13 1 0 14
Sep 2020 121 0 0 121
Aug 2020 88 1 1 90
Jul 2020 3 0 0 3
Jun 2020 138 0 0 138
May 2020 3 0 0 3
Apr 2020 7 0 0 7
Mar 2020 15 0 0 15
Feb 2020 15 0 0 15
Jan 2020 41 1 0 42
Dec 2019 9 0 1 10
Nov 2019 11 0 0 11
Oct 2019 1 0 0 1
Sep 2019 3 0 0 3
Aug 2019 12 0 1 13
Jul 2019 5 0 0 5
Jun 2019 2 0 0 2
May 2019 9 0 0 9
Apr 2019 4 1 0 5
Mar 2019 13 0 0 13
Feb 2019 7 0 0 7
Jan 2019 4 0 0 4
Dec 2018 2 0 0 2
Nov 2018 3 0 0 3
Oct 2018 9 1 0 10
Aug 2018 0 0 1 1