DrIVE-MATH Project: Case Study from the Polytechnic of Porto, PT

References

[1] Cornell University, Getting Started with Active Learning Techniques, Center for Teaching Innovation, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://teaching.cornell.edu/resource/getting-started-activelearning-techniques. Accessed at September 24 2020.Search in Google Scholar

[2] DrIVE-MATH, http://www.isep.ipp.pt/Page/ViewPage/drive_math. Accessed May 29 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Duke University, Active Learning Techniques for the classroom,” Duke: Learning Innovation, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://learninginnovation.duke.edu/faculty-opportunities/art-and-science-ofteaching/active-learning-techniques-classroom. Accessed at September 24 2020.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Jigsaw activity, https://strategiesforspecialinterventions.weebly.com/jigsaw1.html. Accessed at May 29 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Jigsaw classroom, https://www.jigsaw.org/. Accessed at February 16 2021.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Jigsaw-CDIO, http://slideplayer.com/slide/9344337/. Accessed at February 16 2021.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Jigsaw-Sesync, URL: https://www.sesync.org/system/tdf/resources/sescasestudybestpracticesjigsawandcooperativelearning.pdf. Accessed at February 16 2021.Search in Google Scholar

[8] M. Murphy, C. Maccartan, THE CDIO APPROACH TO ENGINEERING EDUCATION:3. Engaging Students in Their Learning, http://slideplayer.com/slide/9344337/. Accessed at november 22 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Project Based Learning, https://www.pblworks.org/what-is-pbl. Accessed at May 29 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Scrum Methodology, URL: https://www.inloox.com/company/blog/articles/the-scrum-methodology/. Accessed at May 29 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[11] S. Lukins. Why Are Soft Skills So Important In the Graduate Job Market? URL: https://www.gooduniversitiesguide.com.au/education-blogs/after-graduation/soft-skills-for-graduates. Accessed at 9 May 2020.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Think-Pair-Share. http://www.adlit.org/strategies/23277/. Accessed at May 29 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Think-Pair-Share, https://www.tes.com/teaching-resource/think-pair-share-place-mat-simpsons-11308541. Accessed at May 29 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[14] R. Watson, Active Learning Spectrum Short Definitions, http://www.uwyo.edu/science-initiative/lamp/al_spectrum.html. Accessed at February 25 2021.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Yotam’s Courses. Retrieved from URL: https://sites.google.com/a/leobaeck.net/courses/grade-8/13-base-groups/activity2-jigsaw-23102010. Accessed at June 29 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[16] R. Amran, F. Yokoyama, & K. Nishino, Development of active learning methods of English in Japanese high schools to support student activities in group discussions. Procedia Computer Science, 96, 1471-1478, 2016.10.1016/j.procs.2016.08.193Search in Google Scholar

[17] L. Babo, J. Mendonça, C. Pinto. Online Math courses: Advantages and obstacles in an informatics baccalaureate, 15th Annual International Technology, Education and Development Conference, 2021, accepted for publication.10.21125/inted.2021.0431Search in Google Scholar

[18] L. Babo, C. Pinto, J. Mendonça, M. Zannin, Motivating engineering students to learn Math: hints from a Calculus course. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, pp. 8433-8440, 2020.Search in Google Scholar

[19] J.B. Biggs, Teaching for quality learning at university. Bucking-ham: Open University Press, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

[20] M. Broy. Software engineering — from auxiliary to key technologies. In: Broy, M., Dener, E. (eds.) Software Pioneers, pp. 10-13. Springer, Heidelberg 2002.10.1007/978-3-642-59412-0_1Search in Google Scholar

[21] L.M. Camarinha-Matos, H. Afsarmanesh, and M. Ollus. ECOLEAD and CNO base concepts. Methods and tools for collaborative networked organizations. Springer, Boston, MA, pp. 3-32, 2008.10.1007/978-0-387-79424-2_1Search in Google Scholar

[22] T. Day, I. C. C. Chang, C. K. L. Chung, W. E. Doolittle, J. Housel, and P. N. McDaniel, The Immediate Impact of COVID-19 on Post-secondary Teaching and Learning. The Professional Geographer, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2021.10.1080/00330124.2020.1823864Search in Google Scholar

[23] G. Duffy, T. Gallagher, Shared Education in contested spaces: How collaborative networks improve communities and schools. Journal of Educational Change 18.1, pp. 107-134, 2017.10.1007/s10833-016-9279-3Search in Google Scholar

[24] K. Edström, A. Kolmos, PBL and CDIO: complementary models for engineering education development. European Journal of Engineering Education, vol.39, no. 5, pp. 539–555, 2014.10.1080/03043797.2014.895703Search in Google Scholar

[25] J. Eison, Using active learning instructional strategies to create excitement and enhance learning, 2010. Retrieved from http://www.cte.cornell.edu/documents/presentations/Eisen-Handout.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[26] A. Francescucci and L. Rohani, Exclusively Synchronous Online (VIRI) Learning: The Impact on Student Performance and Engagement Outcomes. J. Mark. Educ., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 60–69, 2019.10.1177/0273475318818864Search in Google Scholar

[27] S. Freeman, Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.111, no. 23, pp. 8410-8415, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

[28] K.O. Geddes, S.R. Czapor, G. Labahn, Algorithms for Computer Algebra. Kluwer, Boston, 1992.10.1007/b102438Search in Google Scholar

[29] A. Göçer, A comparative research on the effectivity of cooperative learning method and jigsaw technique on teaching literary genres. Educational Research and Reviews, v5(8), 439, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[30] J. Hair, W. Black, B. Babin, R. Anderson, Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[31] C. Hamburger, Quasimonotonicity, regularity and duality for nonlinear systems of partial differential equations. Ann. Mat. Pura. Appl. 169, 321–354, 1995.10.1007/BF01759359Search in Google Scholar

[32] S. Katz, L. Earl, Learning about networked learning communities. School effectiveness and school improvement, 21.1, pp. 27-51, 2010.10.1080/09243450903569718Search in Google Scholar

[33] J. Kingston, Doing Twice as Much Maths in Half the Time: Implementing Scrum Methodology in a Year 7 Mathematics Classroom. TEACH Journal of Christian Education, vol. 9, no.2, pp. 4-7, 2015.10.55254/1835-1492.1289Search in Google Scholar

[34] J. M. da M. Magalhães, Aprendizagem de conteúdos matemáticos de cálculo por alunos do 1.o ano de cursos de engenharia: contextos e materiais didáticos. Universidade do Minho. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1822/46021, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

[35] J. Mendonça, L. Babo, & C. Pinto, Skills of bachelor engineering students attending active-learning math courses. Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Applied Mathematics APLIMAT,pp. 803–813, Bratislava. https://www.worldcat.org/isbn/9788022749831, 2020.Search in Google Scholar

[36] J. Mendonça, L. Babo, C. Pinto. Adaptation to emergency remote teaching by students with distinct ICT backgrounds, EDUCON2021 – IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference 2021, accepted for publication.10.1109/EDUCON46332.2021.9454019Search in Google Scholar

[37] J. Mendonça, C.M. Pinto, S. Nicola, Active-learning: self-motivation in math courses. Proceedings of 12th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, pp. 1870-1877, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[38] J. Mendonça, C. Pinto, S. Nicola, Collaborative networking for educational innovation in math courses – Project DRIVE-MATH. Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, pp. 4548-4553, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[39] J. Mendonça, C.M.A. Pinto, & S. Nicola, Effectiveness of Active-Learning Methodologies in Math Courses for Engineering Students Effectiveness of AL in Math Courses for Engineering Students. Proceedings in SEFI Conference, pp. 755–769, 2019. ISBN 9782873520182, 2020.Search in Google Scholar

[40] M. Moloney, Collaboration/Networking in Education, its contribution to schools. Diss. National University of Ireland Maynooth, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

[41] D. Nicol, From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assess. Eval. High. Educ., vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 501–517, 2010.10.1080/02602931003786559Search in Google Scholar

[42] M. Nichols, K. Cator, & M. Torres, Challenge based learner user guide. Redwood City, CA: Digital Promise, 24-36, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

[43] S. Nicola, J. Mendonça, C.M.A. Pinto. Active-learning techniques in math courses in engineering degrees: the pursuit for a new engineer profile. Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Applied Mathematics - APLIMAT, pp. 786–794, 2018, ISBN: 978-80-227-4765-3, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[44] S. Nicola, C. Pinto, & J. Mendonça, The role of education on the acquisition of 21st century soft skills by engineering students. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education, pp. 1-4, 2018.10.1109/CISPEE.2018.8593495Search in Google Scholar

[45] S. Nicola, J. Mendonça,C. Pinto,& A. Pereira, Education by challenge: innovation driven spirit. Proceedings of 13th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, pp. 5182-5190, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[46] C. Pinto, L. Babo, % J. Mendonça, Is COVID-19 shaping our students’ learning process?. Proceedings of 13th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, pp. 1751-1762, 2020.Search in Google Scholar

[47] C. Pinto, J. Mendonça, and L. Babo, Trends of Active-Learning Teaching Practices Among Engineering Students. Proceedings of 14th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, vol. 1, pp. 8580–8589, 2020.Search in Google Scholar

[48] C. Pinto, J. Mendonça, S. Nicola, & L. Babo. Impact of a new teaching framework for math courses in higher education. Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, pp. 10513-10520, IATED Academy, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[49] C. Pinto, S. Nicola, J. Mendonça, & D. Velichová. Best teaching practices in the first year of the pilot implementation of the project DrIVE-MATH. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 38(3), 154-166, Oxford University Press. 2019.10.1093/teamat/hrz004Search in Google Scholar

[50] C. Pinto, S. Nicola, J. Mendonça, & D. Velichová. Project DrIVE-MATH - Analyzing students’ perceptions of the improvement of their social skills in active-learning courses. Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Applied Mathematics, pp. 943–948, 2019, ISBN: 978-80-227-4884-1, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[51] C. Pinto, S. Nicola, J. Mendonça, D. Velichová, & A. Heler. New Methodologies for Teaching Math Courses in Engineering Degrees. Proceedings of the 19th SEFI Mathematics Working Group Seminar on Mathematics in Engineering Education, p.70, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[52] P. R. Pintrich and A. Zusho, Student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom, in Higher Education. Handbook of Theory and Research, no. XVII, pp. 55–128, 2002.10.1007/978-94-010-0245-5_2Search in Google Scholar

[53] S. Rincón-Gallardo, M. Fullan, Essential features of effective networks in education. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 1.1, pp. 5-22, 2016.10.1108/JPCC-09-2015-0007Search in Google Scholar

[54] A. Rytkönen, T. Kaivola, Collaborative networking for the development of quality in education at university level. Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009.10.1007/978-3-642-04568-4_81Search in Google Scholar

[55] D.R. Sadler, Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instr. Stud., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 119–144, 1989.10.1007/BF00117714Search in Google Scholar

[56] A.R. Santos, A. Sales, P. Fernandes, M. Nichols. Combining Challenge-Based Learning and Scrum Framework for Mobile Application Development. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 189-194. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2729094.2742602.10.1145/2729094.2742602Search in Google Scholar

[57] C.L. Scott, THE FUTURES of LEARNING 1: Why must learning content and methods change in the 21st century? UNESCO Education Research and Foresight, Paris. [ERF Working Papers Series, No. 13]Search in Google Scholar

[58] A. Shekar, Active learning and reflection in product development engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, vol.32, no.2, pp. 125–133, 2007.10.1080/03043790601118705Search in Google Scholar

[59] A. Sliwka, Networking for educational innovation: A comparative analysis. Networks of innovation: Towards new models for managing schools and systems, pp. 49-63, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

[60] J. Sutherland, Scrum: The Art of Doing Twice the Work in Half the Time. Crown Business, ISBN 978-0385346450. 2014.Search in Google Scholar

[61] A. J. Viamonte & I. P. Figueiredo, Can gamification be effective in combating dropout in higher education? In CASHE Conference: Academic Success in Higher Education (pp. 1–3), 2019Search in Google Scholar

[62] M-L. Yu, G.T. Brown, C.R. White, & C.K. Marston, The impact of undergraduate occupational therapy students’ interpersonal skills on their fieldwork education performance: A pilot study. 43-43. Abstract from Conference on Occupational Therapy, Perth, Australia, (2018).Search in Google Scholar

[63] P. Zimmermann, L. Stallings, R. Pierce, and D. Largent, Classroom Interaction Redefined: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Moving beyond Traditional Classroom Spaces to Promote Student Engagement. Journal of Learning Spaces, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 45–61, 2018.Search in Google Scholar