Abstract
Integrated assessment evaluates language proficiency through tasks that require the test-taker to produce a written or spoken output based on listening or reading comprehension (reading or listening-into-writing or speaking). Since integrated assessment aims at reflecting the communicative and cognitive requirements of academic life and other professions, it is considered a means of assessment that is both authentic and valid. Examples of integrated tests can be found in high-stakes examinations at universities with English as the medium of instruction, and in the standardised high-stakes examinations offered by ETS, Pearson Education and Trinity College London. This report provides an example of integrated assessment in action by describing a currently used integrated test developed at the Language Department of the Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia in the Czech Republic. Since 2018, this particular integrated test has served as the entrance examination for Biological Chemistry (EEBC), a bachelor’s degree course delivered entirely in English. By detailing the rationale behind the examination and the design process, this report aims to show that integrated assessment can provide a valid alternative to independent assessment at the tertiary level.
References
ALTE. 2002. ALTE can do project 1992-2002. https://www.cambridgeenglish.org›28906-alte-can-do-document (accessed 13 September 2020).Search in Google Scholar
BALEAP. 2020. Guidelines on English language tests for university entry. https://www.baleap.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/BALEAP-2-Guidelines-on-English-Language-Tests-for-University-Entry.pdf (accessed 4 September 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Chan, Sathena, Chihiro Inoue & Lynda Taylor. 2015. Developing rubrics to assess the reading-into-writing skills: A case study. Assessing Writing 26. 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2015.07.004.Search in Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2001. Common European framework of reference for languages. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdf (accessed 13 September 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Kyle, Kristopher. 2020. The relationship between features of source text use and integrated writing quality. Assessing Writing 45. 100467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100467.Search in Google Scholar
Michel, Marije, Andrea Révész, Xiaojun Lu, Nektaria-Efstathia Kourtali, Minjin Lee & Lais Borges. 2020. Investigating L2 writing processes across independent and integrated tasks: A mixed-methods study. Second Language Research 36(3). 307–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658320915501.Search in Google Scholar
Ohta, Renka, Lia M. Plakans & Atta Gebril. 2018. Integrated writing scores based on holistic and multi-trait scales: A generalizability analysis. Assessing Writing 38: 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.08.001.Search in Google Scholar
Rukthong, Anchana & Tineke Brunfaut. 2019. Is anybody listening? The nature of second language listening in integrated listening-to-summarize tasks. Language Testing 37(1). 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532219871470.Search in Google Scholar
Weigle, Sara Cushing. 2004. Integrating reading and writing in a competency test for non-native speakers of English. Assessing Writing 9(1). 27–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2004.01.002.Search in Google Scholar
Yang, Hui-Chun & Lia Plakans. 2012. Second language writers’ strategy use and performance on an integrated reading-listening-writing task. Tesol Quarterly 46(1). 80–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.6 (accessed 5 September 2020).Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
