Processing Reflexives and Pronouns in Picture Noun Phrase
Corresponding Author
Jeffrey T. Runner
University of Rochester, Department of Linguistics and University of Rochester, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Department of Linguistics, University of Rochester, Box 270096, Rochester, NY 14627. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorRachel S. Sussman
University of Rochester, Department of Linguistics and University of Rochester, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Search for more papers by this authorMichael K. Tanenhaus
University of Rochester, Department of Linguistics and University of Rochester, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jeffrey T. Runner
University of Rochester, Department of Linguistics and University of Rochester, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Department of Linguistics, University of Rochester, Box 270096, Rochester, NY 14627. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorRachel S. Sussman
University of Rochester, Department of Linguistics and University of Rochester, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Search for more papers by this authorMichael K. Tanenhaus
University of Rochester, Department of Linguistics and University of Rochester, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Binding theory (e.g., Chomsky, 1981) has played a central role in both syntactic theory and models of language processing. Its constraints are designed to predict that the referential domains of pronouns and reflexives are nonoverlapping, that is, are complementary; these constraints are also thought to play a role in online reference resolution. The predictions of binding theory and its role in sentence processing were tested in four experiments that monitored participants' eye movements as they followed spoken instructions to have a doll touch a picture belonging to another doll. The instructions used pronouns and reflexives embedded in picture noun phrases (PNPs) containing possessor phrases (e.g., Pick up Ken. Have Ken touch Harry's picture of himself). Although the interpretations assigned to pronouns were generally consistent with binding theory, reflexives were frequently assigned interpretations that violated binding theory. In addition, the timing and pattern of eye movements were inconsistent with models of language processing that assume that binding theory acts as an early filter to restrict the referential domain. The interpretations assigned to reflexives in PNPs with possessors suggest that they are binding-theory-exempt logophors, a conclusion that unifies the treatment of reflexives in PNPs.
References
- Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 419–439.
- Arnold, J. E., Eisenband, J. G., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Trueswell, J. C. (2000). The rapid use of gender information: Evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eye-tracking. Cognition, 76, B13–B26.
- Badecker, W., & Straub, K. (2002). The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 748–769.
- Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L. (1988). Psych-verbs and θ-theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, 291–352.
- Bresnan, J. (2001). Lexical functional syntax. Oxford , England : Blackwell.
- Brown-Schmidt, S., Byron, D., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2005). Beyond salience: Interpretation of personal and demonstrative pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language.
- Chambers, C. G., Tanenhaus, M. K., Eberhard, K. M., Filip, H., & Carlson, G. N. (2002). Circumscribing referential domains in real-time language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 30–49.
- Chisholm, M. (2003). Ellipsis in DP. Unpublished master's thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz.
- Chomsky, N. (1980). On binding. Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 1–46.
- Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht , The Netherlands : Foris.
- Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language. New York : Praeger.
- Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
- Clements, G. N. (1975). The logophoric pronoun in Ewe: Its role in discourse. Journal of West African Languages, 10, 141–177.
- Clifton, C. Jr., Kennison, S. M., & Albrecht, J. (1997). Reading the words “her,”“his,” and “him”: Implications for parsing principles based on frequency and structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 276–292.
- Cohen J. D., MacWhinney B., Flatt M., & Provost J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 257–271.
- Cooper, R. M. (1974). The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory and language processing. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 84–107.
- Crosswhite, K., Masharov, M., McDonough, J. M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (under revision). Phonetic cues to word length in the online processing of onset-embedded word pairs. Journal of Phonetics.
- Dahan, D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2001). Time course of frequency effects in spoken-word recognition: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 317–367.
- Dahan, D., Magnuson, J. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Hogan, E. M. (2002). Subcategorical mismatches and the time course of lexical access: Evidence for lexical competition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 507–534.
- Dahan, D., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2004). Continuous mapping from sound to meaning in spoken-language comprehension: Immediate effects of verb-based thematic constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 498–513.
- Dahan, D., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2005). Looking at the rope when looking for the snake: Conceptually mediated eye movements during spoken-word recognition. Psychological Bulletin and Review.
-
Dalrymple, M. (2001). Lexical functional grammar.
New York
: Academic.
10.1163/9781849500104 Google Scholar
- Davies, W., & Dubinsky, S. (2003). On extraction from NPs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21, 1–37.
- Everaert, M. (2003). Reflexives in discourse. In J. Koster & H. Riemsdijk (Eds.), Germania et Alia: A linguistic Webschrift for Hans den Besten. Retrieved September 23, 2005, from http:odur.let.rug.nl~kosterDenBestencontents.htm.
- Eberhard, K. M., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Sedivy, J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1995). Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 409–436.
- Garnham, A. (2001). Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora. Philadelphia : Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.
- Goldwater, M., & Runner, J. T. (in press). Coreferential interpretations of reflexives in picture noun phrases: An experimental approach. In P. Denis, E. McCready, A. Palmer, & B. Reese (Eds.), Proceedings of the Texas Linguistics Society 8. Austin , TX : University of Texas.
- Gordon, P., & Hendrick, R. (1997). Intuitive knowledge of linguistic co-reference. Cognition, 62, 325–370.
- Grodzinsky, Y., & Reinhart, T. (1993). The innateness of binding and coreference. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 69–101.
- Hagege, C. (1974). Les pronoms logophoriques. Bulletin de la Societe de Linguistique de Paris, 69, 287–310.
- Hanna, J., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, J. C. (2003). The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 42–61.
- Hobbs, J. R. (1978). Resolving pronoun references. Lingua, 44, 311–338.
- Jarvikivi, J., van Gompel, R. P. G., Hyona, J., & Bertram, R. (2005). Ambiguous pronoun resolution: Contrasting the first-mention and subject-preference accounts. Psychological Science, 4, 260–264.
- Kaiser, E. (2003). The quest for a referent: A crosslinguistic look at reference resolution. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
- Kaiser, E., Runner, J. T., Sussman, R. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (in press). The interpretation of pronouns and reflexives in picture noun phrases: Effects of non-structural factors. In A. Alcazar, R. Mayoral Hernandez, & M. Temkin Martinez (Eds.), Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics 2004. Fresno : California State University at Fresno.
- Kaiser, E., & Trueswell, J. C. (in press). Investigating the interpretation of pronouns and demonstratives in Finnish: Going beyond salience. In E. Gibson & N. Pearlmutter (Eds.), The processing and acquisition of reference. Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
- Keller, F., & Asudeh, A. (2001). Constraints on linguistic coreference: Structural vs. pragmatic factors. In J. D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 483–488). Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Kennison, S. (2003). Comprehending the pronouns “her,”“him” and “his”: Implications for theories of referential processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 335–352.
- Kiparsky, P. (2002). Disjoint reference and the typology of pronouns. In I. Kaufmann & B. Stiebels (Eds.), More than words (pp. 179–226). Berlin : Akademie Verlag.
- Kuno, S. (1987). Functional syntax: Anaphora, discourse and empathy. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
- Langacker, R. (1969). On pronominalization and the chain of command. In D. A. Reibel & S. A. Schane (Eds.), Modern studies in English (pp. 160–186). Englewood Cliffs , NJ : Prentice Hall.
- Larson, R. (1988). On the double object construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 589–637.
- Lasnik, H. (1976). Remarks on coreference. Linguistic Analysis, 2, 1–22.
-
Lasnik, H. (1989). Essays on anaphora.
Dordrecht
,
The Netherlands
: Kluwer.
10.1007/978-94-009-2542-7 Google Scholar
- Magnuson, J. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., Aslin, R. N., & Dahan, D. (2003). The time course of spoken word learning and recognition: Studies with artificial lexicons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 202–227.
- Nicol, J., & Swinney, D. (1989). The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 5–19.
- Pollard, C., & Sag, I. (1992). Anaphors in English and the scope of binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 23, 261–303.
- Pollard, C., & Sag, I. (1994). Head-driven sentence structure grammar. Chicago : CSLI/University of Chicago Press.
- Reinhart, T. (1976). The syntactic domain of anaphora. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
- Reinhart, T., & Reuland, E. (1993). Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 657–720.
- Ross, J. R. (1969). On the cyclic nature of English pronominalization. In D. A. Reibel & S. A. Schane (Eds.), Modern studies in English (pp. 187–200). Englewood Cliffs , NJ : Prentice Hall.
- Runner, J. T., & Kaiser, E. (2005). Binding in picture noun phrases: Implications for binding theory. In S. Müller (Ed.), The Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Department of Informatics, University of Lisbon (pp. 594–613). Stanford , CA : CSLI Publications.
- Runner, J. T., Sussman, R. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2003). Assignment of reference to reflexives and pronouns in picture noun phrases: Evidence from eye movements. Cognition, 81, B1–B13.
- Sag, I. (1976). Deletion and logical form. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
- Salverda, A., Dahan, D., Tanenhaus, M. K., Masharov, M., Crosswhite, K., & McDonough, J. M. (in press). Prosodic effects on lexical competitors. Manuscript submitted for publication.
- Salverda, A. P., Dahan, D., & McQueen, J. M. (2003). The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension. Cognition, 90, 51–89.
-
Sanford, A. J.,
Garrod, S.,
Lucas, A., &
Henderson, R. (1983). Pronouns without explicit antecedents.
Journal of Semantics, 2, 303–318.
10.1093/semant/2.3-4.303 Google Scholar
- Sells, P., Zaenen, A., & Zec, D. (1987). Reflexivization variation: Relations between syntax, semantics and lexical structure. In M. Iida et al. (Eds.), Working papers in grammatical theory and discourse structure. Stanford , CA : CSLI.
- Sturt, P. (2003). The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 542–562.
- Tanenhaus, M. K., Magnuson, J. S., Dahan, D., & Chambers, C. (2000). Eye movements and lexical access in spoken-language comprehension: Evaluating a linking hypothesis between fixations and linguistic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 557–580.
- Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. E. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 632–634.
- Tetreault, J. R. (2001). A corpus-based evaluation of centering and pronoun resolution. Computational Linguistics, 27, 507–520.
- Tetreault, J. R., & Allen, J. (2004, July). Semantics, dialogue, and pronoun resolution. Paper presented at CATALOG 1904, Barcelona, Spain.