Article Text
Abstract
Background Patients with functional seizures (FS) can experience dissociation (depersonalisation) before their seizures. Depersonalisation reflects disembodiment, which may be related to changes in interoceptive processing. The heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP) is an electroencephalogram (EEG) marker of interoceptive processing.
Aim To assess whether alterations in interoceptive processing indexed by HEP occur prior to FS and compare this with epileptic seizures (ES).
Methods HEP amplitudes were calculated from EEG during video-EEG monitoring in 25 patients with FS and 19 patients with ES, and were compared between interictal and preictal states. HEP amplitude difference was calculated as preictal HEP amplitude minus interictal HEP amplitude. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of HEP amplitude difference in discriminating FS from ES.
Results The FS group demonstrated a significant reduction in HEP amplitude between interictal and preictal states at F8 (effect size rB=0.612, false discovery rate (FDR)-corrected q=0.030) and C4 (rB=0.600, FDR-corrected q=0.035). No differences in HEP amplitude were found between states in the ES group. Between diagnostic groups, HEP amplitude difference differed between the FS and ES groups at F8 (rB=0.423, FDR-corrected q=0.085) and C4 (rB=0.457, FDR-corrected q=0.085). Using HEP amplitude difference at frontal and central electrodes plus sex, we found that the ROC curve demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.893, with sensitivity=0.840 and specificity=0.842.
Conclusion Our data support the notion that aberrant interoception occurs prior to FS. Changes in HEP amplitude may reflect a neurophysiological biomarker of FS and may have diagnostic utility in differentiating FS and ES.
- EPILEPSY
- FUNCTIONAL NEUROLOGICAL DISORDER
- NEUROPSYCHIATRY
- NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
- EEG
Data availability statement
Data are available upon reasonable request. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
Data are available upon reasonable request. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.
Footnotes
Contributors Study conception and study design: SE, DM-L, AK and MY; data collection: SE, AK,and CJ; data analysis: SE, DM-L and MY; interpretation of results: SE, DM-L, AK, RK, MM, HDC, MJE, SG, MPR and MY; preparation of the draft of the manuscript: SE, DM-L and MY. All authors contributed to the critical revision of the manuscript, reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript. MY is the guarantor for this study.
Competing interests MM is editor-in-chief of Epilepsy & Behavior. MJE received honoraria for educational activities from Merz Pharma, UCB and the International Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders Society; received royalties from the Oxford University Press; and provided expert testimony in clinical negligence and personal injury matters. MY carries out independent expert medicolegal work including in relation to functional neurological disorders.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.