Full Access
Fostering Second Language Oral Communication Through Constructivist Interaction in Desktop Videoconferencing
Lina Lee,
Lina Lee
University of New Hampshire
Lina Lee (PhD, University of Texas at Austin) is Associate Professor of Spanish at the University of New Hampshire in Durham, New Hampshire.
Search for more papers by this authorLina Lee,
Lina Lee
University of New Hampshire
Lina Lee (PhD, University of Texas at Austin) is Associate Professor of Spanish at the University of New Hampshire in Durham, New Hampshire.
Search for more papers by this authorFirst published: 31 December 2008
Citations: 66
Abstract
This article describes a classroom project using one-to-one desktop videoconferencing to enhance the development of second language (1.2) oral skills. Eighteen university students worked collaboratively with expert speakers to complete task-based activities. The author gathered data from video-recording samples, reflections, and oral interviews to report the participants' experiences and examine the potential of desktop videoconferencing to support speaking skills. While this approach is effective in supporting collaborative learning and fostering L2 oral communication, learners with less sophisticated listening skills experienced difficulties comprehending native speakers. Native speakers' linguistic variations, including regionalisms and accents, also affected the degree of the interactivity. This study suggests three essential ingredients to maximize the potential benefits of desktop videoconferencing for language learning: (1) use of carefully designed tasks that engage learners, (2) appropriate selection of linguistic context, and (3) inclusion of sufficient network training.
References
- Abrams, Z. (2003). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 157–167.
- ACTFL proficiency guidelines-Speaking (1999). Yonkers, NY: American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
- Barr, D., Leakey, J., & Ranchoux, A. (2005). Told like it is! An evaluation of an integrated oral development pilot project. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3). Retrieved March 4, 2006, from http:llt.msu.eduvol9num3barrdefault.html.
- Belz, J. A. (2002). Social dimensions of tele-collaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1). Retrieved February 10, 2006, from http:llt.msu.eduvol6numlBELZdefault.html.
-
Belz, J. A. (2005). Intercultural questioning, discovery, and tension in Internet mediated language learning partnerships.
Language and Intercultural Communication, 5(1), 3–39.
10.1080/14708470508668881 Google Scholar
- Blake, R., & Zyzik, E. (2003). Who's helping whom?: Learner/heritage speakers' networked discussions in Spanish. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 519–544.
- Bonk, C. J., & Cunningham, D. J. (1998). Searching for learner-centered, constructivist, and sociocultural components of collaborative educational learning tools. In C. J. Bonk & K. S. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators (pp. 25–50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Buckett, J., Stringer, G., & Datta, K. J. (1999). Life after ReLaTe: Internet videoconferencing's growing pains. Proceedings of CALL and the Learning Community. Retrieved March 4, 2006, from http:www.ex.ac.ukpallasrelatepaperslife.html.
-
Canale, M., &
Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing.
Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–47.
10.1093/applin/1.1.1 Google Scholar
- Coverdale-Jones, T. (2000). The use of video-conferencing as a communication tool for language learning: Issues and considerations. IALL Journal, 32(1), 27–40.
- Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In J. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 27–50). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Dussias, P. E. (2005). Telecollaboration and lexical and morphological development in Spanish L2. In J. A. Belz & S. L. Thorne (Eds.), Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education (pp. 121–146). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
- Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Furstenberg, G., Levet, S., English, K., & Maillet, K. (2001). Giving a voice to the silent language of culture: The cultura [cultural] project. Language Learning & Technology, 5(1). Retrieved February 10, 2006, from http:llt.msu.eduvol5numlfurstenbergdefault.html.
-
Goodfellow, R.,
Jeffreys, T. M., &
Shirra, T. (1996). Face-to-face language learning at a distance? A study of a videoconference tryout.
ReCALL, 8(2), 5–16.
10.1017/S0958344000003530 Google Scholar
- Goulah, J. (2007). Village voices, global visions: Digital video as a transformative foreign language learning tool. Foreign Language Annals, 40(1), 62–78.
- Hampel, R., & Hauck, M. (2004). Towards an effective use of audio conferencing in distance language courses. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 66–82.
- Hearnshaw, D. (2000). Effective desktop videoconferencing with minimal network demands. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(3), 221–228.
- Kasper G. (2001). Four perspectives on L2 pragmatic development. Applied Linguistics, 22(4), 502–530.
- Katz, S. (2001). Videoconferencing with the French-speaking world: A user's guide. Foreign Language Annals, 34(2), 152–157.
- Kinginger, C. (1998). Videoconferencing as access to spoken French. Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 502–513.
- Kinginger, C. (2000). Learning the pragmatics of solidarity in the networked classroom. In J. K. Hall & L. S. Verplaetse (Eds.), The development of second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 23–46). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Kinginger, C. (2001). Sociocultural approaches to teaching and teachers' research. In R. Z. Lavine (ed.), Beyond the boundaries: Changing contexts in language learning (pp. 201–225). New York: McGraw-Hill.
-
Kinginger, C., &
Belz, J. A. (2005). Sociocultural perspectives on pragmatic development in foreign language learning: Microgenetic case studies from telecollaboration and residence abroad.
Intercultural Pragmatics, 2(4), 369–422.
10.1515/iprg.2005.2.4.369 Google Scholar
- Kinginger, C., Gourves-Hayward, A., & Simpson, V. (1999). A tele-collaborative course on French-American intercultural communication. French Review, 72(5), 853–866.
-
Kitade, K. (2000). L2 learners' discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in Internet chat.
Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 13(2), 146–166.
10.1076/0958-8221(200004)13:2;1-D;FT143 Google Scholar
- Lee, L. (2000). Evaluating intermediate Spanish students' speaking skills through a taped test: A pilot study. Hispania, 83, 127–138.
- Lee, L. (2002a). Enhancing learners' communication skills through synchronous electronic interaction and task-based instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 35(1), 16–23.
- Lee, L. (2002b). Synchronous online exchanges: A study of modification devices on nonnative discourse interaction. System, 30, 275–288.
- Lee, L. (2004a). Native and nonnative speakers' perceptions of networked collaborative interaction: A sociocultural approach. In L. Lomicka & J. Cooke-Plagwitz (Eds.), Technology and the language teacher: The theoretical, historical, and practical interface (pp. 248–261). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
- Lee, L. (2004b). Learners' perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the US. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1). Retrieved February 21, 2006, from http:llt.msu.eduvol8numlleedefault.html.
- Lee, L. (2005). Using web-based instruction to promote active learning: Learners' perspectives. CALICO Journal, 23(1), 139–156.
- Lee, L. (2006). A study of native and nonnative speakers' feedback and responses in Spanish-American networked collaborative interaction. In J. A. Belz & S. L. Thorne (Eds.), Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education (pp. 147–176). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
-
Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/oso/9780198236320.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Long, M. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition, Vol. 2 (pp. 413–478). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- McCafferty, S. G., & Ahmed, M. K. (2000). The appropriation of gestures of the abstract by L2 learners. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 199–218). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project. (2006). Standards for foreign language learning in the 21st century, 3rd ed. Alexandria, VA: Author.
-
O'Dowd, R. (2000). Intercultural learning via videoconferencing: A pilot exchange project.
ReCALL, 12(1), 49–63.
10.1017/S0958344000000616 Google Scholar
-
O'Dowd, R. (2005). Negotiating sociocultural and institutional contexts: The case of Spanish-American telecollaboration.
Language and Intercultural Communication, 5(1), 40–56.
10.1080/14708470508668882 Google Scholar
- Ohta, A. (2000). Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition and L2 grammar. In J. L. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 51–78). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
-
Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer &
R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59–86). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9781139524735.006 Google Scholar
- Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9–34). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
- Smith, B. (2004). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction and lexical acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 365–398.
- Sotillo, M. S. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1). Retrieved January 17, 2006, from http:llt.msu.eduvol4numlsotillodefault.html.
- Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320–337.
- Thorne, S., (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2). Retrieved January 19, 2006, from http:llt.msu.eduvol7num2thornedefault.html.
- Tudini, V. (2003). Using native speakers in chat. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3). Retrieved January 17, 2006, from http:llt.msu.eduvol7num3tudinidefault.html.
- Vygotsky L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Wang, Y. (2004). Supporting synchronous distance language learning with desktop videoconferencing. Language Learning and Technology, 8(3). Retrieved February 21, 2006, from http:llt.msu.eduvol8num3wangdefault.html.
- Ware, P. D., & Kramsch, C. (2005). Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. Modern Language Journal, 89(2), 190–205.
-
Warschauer, M. (2000). On-line learning in second language classroom: An ethnographic study. In M. Warschauer &
R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 41–58). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9781139524735.005 Google Scholar
- Weasenforth, D., Biesenbach-Lucas, B., & Meloni, C. (2002). Realizing constructivist objectives through collaborative technologies: Threaded discussions. Language Learning & Technology, 6(3). Retrieved February 22, 2006, from http:llt.msu.eduvol6num3weasenforth.
- Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 17(2), 89–100.
-
Zahner, C.,
Fauverge, A., &
Wong, J. (2000). Task-based language learning via audiovisual networks: The LEVERAGE project. In M. Warschauer &
R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 186–203). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9781139524735.011 Google Scholar
