Volume 56, Issue s1 p. 279-304
Free Access

A Meta-analysis of Hemodynamic Studies on First and Second Language Processing: Which Suggested Differences Can We Trust and What Do They Mean?

Peter Indefrey

Peter Indefrey

Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics and F. C. Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging

Search for more papers by this author
concerning this article should be addressed to Peter Indefrey, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, P. O. Box 310, 6500 AH Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Internet: [email protected]

Abstract

This article presents the results of a meta-analysis of 30 hemodynamic experiments comparing first language (L1) and second language (L2) processing in a range of tasks. The results suggest that reliably stronger activation during L2 processing is found (a) only for task-specific subgroups of L2 speakers and (b) within some, but not all regions that are also typically activated in native language processing. A tentative interpretation based on the functional roles of frontal and temporal regions is suggested.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.