Background and study aims: Gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) is a risk factor for development of intestinal-type
gastric cancer. We aimed to assess the usefulness of confocal laser endomicroscopy
(CLE) in diagnosing GIM.
Patients and methods: 28 patients with known GIM underwent CLE, and CLE criteria for diagnosis of GIM were
developed. In addition, 53 consecutive patients with known or suspected GIM were prospectively
evaluated.
Results: GIM was identified if any of the following three features were present in an image
field: goblet cells, columnar absorptive cells and brush border, and villiform foveolar
epithelium. GIM was then classified as complete or incomplete according to the shape
of the goblet cells, the presence of absorptive cells or brush border, and the architecture
of vessels and crypts. In a prospective study, a total of 13 670 CLE images were obtained.
Among 267 sites from 53 patients, 160 from 36 patients were diagnosed histopathologically
as GIM. The sensitivities of conventional endoscopy and CLE for GIM were 36.88 % vs.
98.13 %, and the specificities were 91.59 % vs. 95.33 %, respectively. The kappa value
for the correlation with histological findings was 0.25 for conventional endoscopy
vs. 0.94 for CLE. The sensitivity and specificity of CLE were 68.03 % and 89.66 %,
respectively, for the diagnosis of complete GIM, and 68.42 % and 83.41 %, respectively,
for incomplete GIM; the kappa value for the correspondence between CLE and histological
findings was 0.67.
Conclusion: CLE is a useful and potentially important method for the diagnosis and classification
of GIM in vivo.
References
1
Walker M M.
Is intestinal metaplasia of the stomach reversible?.
Gut.
2003;
52
1-4
2
Zhou L, Sung J J, Lin S. et al .
A five-year follow-up study on the pathological changes of gastric mucosa after H.
pylori eradication.
Chin Med J (Engl).
2003;
116
11-14
3
Kato I, Vivas J, Plummer M. et al .
Environmental factors in Helicobacter pylori-related gastric precancerous lesions
in Venezuela.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev.
2004;
13
468-476
4
Sauerbruch T, Schreiber M A, Schüssler P. et al .
Endoscopy in the diagnosis of gastritis: diagnostic value of endoscopic criteria in
relation to histological diagnosis.
Endoscopy.
1984;
16
101-104
5
Kaminishi M, Yamaguchi H, Nomura S. et al .
Endoscopic classification of chronic gastritis based on a pilot study by the Research
Society for Gastritis.
Dig Endosc.
2002;
14
138-151
6
Uedo N, Ishihara R, Iishi H. et al .
A new method of diagnosing gastric intestinal metaplasia: narrow-band imaging with
magnifying endoscopy.
Endoscopy.
2006;
38
819-824
7
Dinis-Ribeiro D M, da Costa-Pereira C, Lopes C. et al .
Magnification chromoendoscopy for the diagnosis of gastric intestinal metaplasia and
dysplasia.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2003;
57
498-504
8
Kim S, Harum K, Ito M. et al .
Magnifying gastroendoscopy for diagnosis of histologic gastritis in the gastric antrum.
Dig Liver Dis.
2004;
36
286-291
10
Nakayoshi T, Tajiri H, Matsuda K. et al .
Magnifying endoscopy combined with narrow band imaging system for early gastric cancer:
correlation of vascular pattern with histopathology (including video).
Endoscopy.
2004;
36
1080-1084
11
Kara M A, Ennahachi M, Fockens P. et al .
Detection and classification of the mucosal and vascular patterns (mucosal morphology)
in Barrett’s esophagus by using narrow band imaging.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
64
155-166
13
Kiesslich R, Gossner L, Goetz M. et al .
In vivo histology of Barrett's esophagus and associated neoplasia by confocal laser
endomicroscopy.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2006;
4
979-987
14
Kiesslich R, Burg J, Vieth M. et al .
Confocal laser endoscopy for diagnosing intraepithelial neoplasias and colorectal
cancer in vivo.
Gastroenterology.
2004;
127
706-713
15
Kiesslich R, Goetz M, Burg J, Stolte M. et al .
Dignosing Helicobacter pylori in vivo by confocal laser endoscopy.
Gastroenterology.
2005;
128
2119-2123
16
Kakeji Y, Yamaguchi S, Yoshida D. et al .
Development and assessment of morphologic criteria for diagnosing gastric cancer using
confocal endomicroscopy: an ex vivo and in vivo study.
Endoscopy.
2006;
38
886-890
18
Dixon M F, Genta R M, Yardley J H. et al .
Classification and grading of gastritis. The updated Sydney System. International
Workshop on the Histopathology of Gastritis, Houston 1994.
Am J Surg Pathol.
1996;
20
1161-1181
19
Lin B R, Shun C T, Wang T H. et al .
Endoscopic diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia of stomach – accuracy judged by histology.
Hepatogastroenterology.
1999;
46
62-166
21
Filipe M I, Munoz N, Matko I. et al .
Intestinal metaplasia types and the risk of gastric cancer: a cohort study in Slovenia.
Int J Cancer.
1994;
57
324-329
23
You W C, Zhang L, Gail M H. et al .
Precancerous lesions in two counties of China with contrasting gastric cancer risk.
Int J Epidemiol.
1998;
27
945-948
24
Tosi P, Filipe M I, Luzi P. et al .
Gastric intestinal metaplasia type III cases are classified as low-grade dysplasia
on the basis of morphometry.
J Pathol.
1993;
169
73-78
25
Meining A, Morgner A, Miehlke S. et al .
Atrophy–metaplasia–dysplasia–carcinoma sequence in the stomach: a reality or merely
an hypothesis?.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol.
2001;
15
983-998
26
Rokkas T, Filipe M I, Sladen G E.
Detection of an increased incidence of early gastric cancer in patients with intestinal
metaplasia type III who are closely followed up.
Gut.
1991;
32
1110-1113
27
Dinis-Ribeiro M, Lopes C, da Costa-Pereira A. et al .
A follow up model for patients with atrophic chronic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia.
J Clin Pathol.
2004;
57
177-182