CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2019; 07(06): E764-E770
DOI: 10.1055/a-0894-4374
Original article
Owner and Copyright © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019

Evaluating the effect of injecting triamcinolone acetonide in two sessions for preventing esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection

Satoru Hashimoto
1   Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Niigata, Japan
,
Ken-ichi Mizuno
1   Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Niigata, Japan
,
Kazuya Takahashi
1   Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Niigata, Japan
,
Hiroki Sato
1   Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Niigata, Japan
,
Junji Yokoyama
2   Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Department of Endoscopy, Niigata, Japan
,
Manabu Takeuchi
3   Nagaoka Red Cross Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Niigata, Japan
,
Yuichi Sato
4   Niigata Prefecture Yoshida Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Niigata, Japan
,
Masaaki Kobayashi
5   Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Niigata, Japan
,
Shuji Terai
1   Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Niigata, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 23 September 2018

accepted after revision 14 March 2019

Publication Date:
17 May 2019 (online)

Zoom Image

Abstract

Background and study aims Several previous reports indicate that endoscopic injection of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) after widespread endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is effective for preventing esophageal stricture. We investigated the efficacy of injecting TA in two sessions for preventing stricture formation post-ESD.

Patients and methods Sixty-six consecutive patients with widespread mucosal defects that affected more than three-fourths of the circumference of the esophagus were included. The study group (n = 40) received TA injections over two sessions: immediately after and 14 days after ESD. The control group (n = 26) did not receive a TA injection. This study was performed retrospectively against historical controls. The primary endpoint of this study was frequency of stricture after TA injection. The secondary endpoint was number of required endoscopic balloon dilations (EBDs) after TA injection.

Results The post-ESD stricture rate among patients who had subcircumferential mucosal defects was 45.7 % in the study group (16/35 patients), which was significantly lower than the rate of 73.9 % in the control group (17/23 patients; P = 0.031). The number of EBD procedures required was significantly lower in the study group (median 0, range 0 – 7) than in the control group (median 4, range 0 – 20; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the study and control groups among the patients who had full circumferential mucosal defects.

Conclusion This study showed that performing two sessions of TA injection is an effective and safe treatment for prevention of esophageal stricture following subcircumferential ESD.