Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

British Journal of Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. british journal of cancer
  3. regular article
  4. article
The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception and mental health in women with a family history of breast cancer
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Regular Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 29 January 1999

The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception and mental health in women with a family history of breast cancer

  • M Watson1,
  • S Lloyd1,
  • J Davidson1,
  • L Meyer1,
  • R Eeles1,
  • S Ebbs2 &
  • …
  • V Murday3 

British Journal of Cancer volume 79, pages 868–874 (1999)Cite this article

  • 4129 Accesses

  • 9 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

This article has been updated

Summary

The present study investigated: (1) perception of genetic risk and, (2) the psychological effects of genetic counselling in women with a family history of breast cancer. Using a prospective design, with assessment pre- and post-genetic counselling at clinics and by postal follow-up at 1, 6 and 12 months, attenders at four South London genetic clinics were assessed. Participants included 282 women with a family history of breast cancer. Outcome was measured in terms of mental health, cancer-specific distress and risk perception. High levels of cancer-specific distress were found pre-genetic counselling, with 28% of participants reporting that they worried about breast cancer ‘frequently or constantly’ and 18% that worry about breast cancer was ‘a severe or definite problem’. Following genetic counselling, levels of cancer-specific distress were unchanged. General mental health remained unchanged over time (33% psychiatric cases detected pre-genetic counselling, 27% at 12 months after genetic counselling).

Prior to their genetics consultation, participants showed poor knowledge of their lifetime risk of breast cancer since there was no association between their perceived lifetime risk (when they were asked to express this as a 1 in x odds ratio) and their actual risk, when the latter was calculated by the geneticist at the clinic using the CASH model. In contrast, women were more accurate about their risk of breast cancer pre-genetic counselling when this was assessed in broad categorical terms (i.e. very much lower/very much higher than the average woman) with a significant association between this rating and the subsequently calculated CASH risk figure (P= 0.001). Genetic counselling produced a modest shift in the accuracy of perceived lifetime risk, expressed as an odds ratio, which was maintained at 12 months’ follow-up. A significant minority failed to benefit from genetic counselling; 77 women continued to over-estimate their risk and maintain high levels of cancer-related worry.

Most clinic attenders were inaccurate in their estimates of the population risk of breast cancer with only 24% able to give the correct figure prior to genetic counselling and 36% over-estimating this risk. There was some improvement following genetic counselling with 62% able to give the correct figure, but this information was poorly retained and this figure had dropped to 34% by the 1-year follow-up. The study showed that women attending for genetic counselling are worried about breast cancer, with 34% indicating that they had initiated the referral to the genetic clinic themselves. This anxiety is not alleviated by genetic counselling, although women reported that it was less of a problem at follow-up. Women who continue to over-estimate their risk and worry about breast cancer are likely to go on seeking unnecessary screening if they are not reassured.

Similar content being viewed by others

Assessment of psychosocial difficulties by genetic clinicians and distress in women at high risk of breast cancer: a prospective study

Article Open access 11 April 2022

Communication processes about predictive genetic testing within high-risk breast cancer families: a two-phase study design

Article Open access 11 October 2021

Breast cancer polygenic risk scores: a 12-month prospective study of patient reported outcomes and risk management behavior

Article 02 August 2021

Article PDF

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication

References

  • Claus, E. B., Risch, N. J. & Thompson, W. D. (1991). Genetic analysis of breast cancer in the cancer and steroid hormone study. Am J Hum Genet 48: 232–242.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. G. R., Blair, V., Greenhalgh, R., Hopwood, P. & Howell, A. (1994). The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception in women with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Cancer 70: 934–938.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D. & Williams, P. (1988). A User’s Guide to the General Health Questionnaire, NFER-Nelson: Windsor, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, C. H. & Brown, R. A. (1978). Counting lives. J Occ Accidents 2: 55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, M., Wilner, N. & Alvarez, W. (1979). Impact of events scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med 41: 209–218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kash, K. M., Holland, J. C., Halper, M. S. & Miller, D. G. (1992). Psychological distress and surveillance behaviours of women with a family history of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 84: 24–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, C., Chase, G. & Child, B. (1972). Genetic counselling, a consumer’s view. N Engl J Med 287: 433

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, C. & Schwartz, M. (1993). Adherence and psychological adjustment among women at high risk for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 28: 145–155.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, C., Trock, B., Rimer, B., Boyce, A., Jepson, C. & Engstrom, P. (1991). Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms. Ann Int Med 114: 657–661.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, S., Watson, M., Waites, B., Meyer, L., Eeles, R., Ebbs, S. & Tylee, A. (1996). Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling. Br J Cancer 74: 482–487.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • May, S. (1992). Patient satisfaction and the detection of psychiatric morbidity in general practice. Family Practice 9: 76–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, T. & Greer, S. (1982). Psychological characteristics of women electing to attend a breast screening clinic. Clin Oncol 8: 113–119.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miki, Y., Swensen, J., Shattuck-Eidens, D., Futreal, A., Harshman, K., Tavtigian, S. & Lui, Q. (1994). A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science 266: 66–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D. (1983). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults, Consulting Psychologists’ Press: Palo Alto, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, M., Lloyd, S., Eeles, R., Ponder, B., Easton, D., Seal, S., Averill, D., Daly, P., Ormiston, W. & Murday, V. (1996). Psychosocial impact of testing (by linkage) for the BRCA1 breast cancer gene: an investigation of two families in the research setting. Psycho-oncology 5: 233–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, M., Duvivier, V., Wade Walsh, M., Ashley, S., Papaikonomou, M., Eeles, R., Sacks, N. & Murday, V. (1998). Family history of breast cancer: what do women understand and recall about their genetic risk? J Med Genetics 35: 731–738.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wooster, R., Bignell, G., Lancaster, J., Swift, S., Seal, S. & Mangion, J. (1995). Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature 378: 789–792.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Royal Marsden NHS Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT, Surrey, UK

    M Watson, S Lloyd, J Davidson, L Meyer & R Eeles

  2. Mayday University Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT, Surrey, UK

    S Ebbs

  3. St George’s Hospital Medical School, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT, Surrey, UK

    V Murday

Authors
  1. M Watson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. S Lloyd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. J Davidson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. L Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. R Eeles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. S Ebbs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. V Murday
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watson, M., Lloyd, S., Davidson, J. et al. The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception and mental health in women with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Cancer 79, 868–874 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690139

Download citation

  • Received: 17 June 1998

  • Accepted: 03 August 1998

  • Published: 29 January 1999

  • Issue Date: 01 February 1999

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690139

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Special Issues
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

British Journal of Cancer (Br J Cancer)

ISSN 1532-1827 (online)

ISSN 0007-0920 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Italy
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited