Hostname: page-component-669899f699-cf6xr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T01:33:13.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How empathy-based sensitisation and knowledge reinforcement affect policy compliance: a case study of dolphin watching, Ecuador

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2021

Ricardo Villalba-Briones Open the ORCID record for Ricardo Villalba-Briones [Opens in a new window] ,
Mariela A. González-Narvaez  and
Tomas Vitvar
Ricardo Villalba-Briones*
Affiliation:
ESPOL Polytechnic University, Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral, Facultad Ciencias de la Vida, Campus Gustavo Galindo Km. 30.5 Via Perimetral, P.O. Box 09-01-5863, Guayaquil, Ecuador
Mariela A. González-Narvaez
Affiliation:
ESPOL Polytechnic University, Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral, Facultad Ciencias de la Vida, Campus Gustavo Galindo Km. 30.5 Via Perimetral, P.O. Box 09-01-5863, Guayaquil, Ecuador
Tomas Vitvar
Affiliation:
ESPOL Polytechnic University, Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral, Facultad Ciencias de la Vida, Campus Gustavo Galindo Km. 30.5 Via Perimetral, P.O. Box 09-01-5863, Guayaquil, Ecuador
*
*Corresponding author: E-mail: rvillalba@espol.edu.ec
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cetacean watching is an increasingly popular economic activity in Ecuador for tourism operators. Despite government regulations, cetacean watching can have a negative impact on observed animal populations. To enhance good dolphin-watching practices, a course was carried out in Puerto El Morro, Ecuador about sensitisation activities promoting empathy towards and knowledge about bottlenose dolphins, local avifauna and mangrove ecosystems. The course provided tourism operator staff with theoretical and practical knowledge on dolphin physiology and ecology, with a focus on empathy towards the species and on regulations to be respected during the watching tours. The course included interactive workshops, didactic materials, advice, video screening and structured conversations. Two innovative questionnaires were implemented on the boat during 68 dolphin-watching tours to evaluate whether the training course had improved the regulation compliance and on-tour guiding quality of the tour guides and boat drivers. The results showed a statistically significant improvement in dolphin-watching practices in compliance with the “Regulations for the Whale and Dolphin Watching of Ecuador” (p = .0002) and in guidance quality (p = .0004) after the training course. Boat drivers were identified as influential actors in compliance with regulations and should also be included in the environmental awareness training courses. The study showed that empathy-based sensitisation and knowledge reinforcement positively affect policy compliance and can generate new sustainable approaches for future dolphin-watching activities.

Keywords

empathyecotourismdolphin-watchingenvironmental awarenessmanagementguidelinesenvironmental education
Type
Research/Practice Articles
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , November 2021 , pp. 285 - 305
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aburto-Oropeza, O., Ezcurra, E., Danemann, G., Valdez, V., Murray, J., & Sala, E. (2008). Mangroves in the Gulf of California increase fishery yields. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 10456–10459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahn, S.J.G., Bostick, J., Ogle, E., Nowak, K.L., McGillicuddy, K.T., & Bailenson, J.N. (2016). Experiencing nature: Embodying animals in immersive virtual environments increases inclusion of nature in self and involvement with nature. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21, 399–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, S., Smith, H., Waples, K., & Harcourt, R. (2007). The voluntary code of conduct for dolphin watching in Port Stephens, Australia: Is self-regulation an effective management tool? Journal of Cetacean Research and Management, 9, 159–166.Google Scholar
Amerson, A., & Parsons, E.C.M. (2018). Evaluating the sustainability of the gray-whale-watching industry along the pacific coast of North America. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26, 1362–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, D.L., Jenkins, A.C., Banaji, M.R., & Mitchell, J.P. (2008). Taking another person’s perspective increases self-referential neural processing. Psychological Science, 19, 642–644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ardoin, N.M., Clark, C., & Kelsey, E. (2013). An exploration of future trends in environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 19, 499–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argüelles, M.B., Coscarella, M., Fazio, A., & Bertellotti, M. (2016). Impact of whale-watching on the short-term behavior of Southern right whales (Eubalaena australis) in Patagonia, Argentina. Tourism Management Perspectives, 18, 118–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballantyne, R., Fien, J., & Packer, J. (2001). Program effectiveness in facilitating intergenerational influence in environmental education: Lessons from the field. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32, 8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batson, C.D., Klein, T.R., Highberger, L., & Shaw, L.L. (1995). Immorality from empathy-induced altruism: When compassion and justice conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1042–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batson, C.D., Lishner, D.A., & Stocks, E.L. (2015). The empathy–Altruism hypothesis. In Schroeder, D. A. & Graziano, W. G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior (pp. 259–268). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bejder, L., Dawson, S. M., & Harraway, J. A. (1999). Responses by Hector’s dolphins to boats and swimmers in Porpoise Bay, New Zealand. Marine Mammal Science, 15, 738–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berenguer, J. (2010). The effect of empathy in environmental moral reasoning. Environment and Behavior, 42, 110–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckstaff, K.C. (2004). Effects of watercraft noise on the acoustic behavior of bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, in Sarasota Bay, Florida. Marine Mammal Science, 20, 709–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, J., Harrison, C.M., & Filius, P. (1998). Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship. Environment and Planning A, 30, 1445–1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, C., Rose, N., Kato, H., & Williams, R. (2014). The International Whaling Commission (IWC) and whale-watching. Whale-watching: Sustainable Tourism and Ecological Management, 71.Google Scholar
Chawla, L., & Cushing, D.F. (2007). Education for strategic environmental behavior. Environmental Education Research, 13, 437–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, S.D. (2019). Economic contribution of ecotourism, motivations and satisfaction: The Case of Puerto El Morro (Ecuador). European Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 92–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, S.F., & Roome, N.J. (1995). Managing for environmentally sensitive technology: Networks for collaboration and learning. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 7, 191–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constantine, R., Brunton, D. H., & Dennis, T. (2004). Dolphin-watching tour boats change bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) behaviour. Biological Conservation, 117, 299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, T.C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J.W., Chan, K.M., & Grêt-Regamey, A. (2012). Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 8812–8819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daura-Jorge, F.G., Cantor, M., Ingram, S.N., Lusseau, D., & Simões-Lopes, P.C. (2012). The structure of a bottlenose dolphin society is coupled to a unique foraging cooperation with artisanal fishermen. Biology Letters, 8, 702–705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, M.H., Conklin, L., Smith, A., & Luce, C. (1996). Effect of perspective taking on the cognitive representation of persons: A merging of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 713–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Los Monteros, R.L.E. (2002). Evaluating ecotourism in natural protected areas of La Paz Bay, Baja California Sur, Mexico: Ecotourism or nature-based tourism? Biodiversity & Conservation, 11, 1539–1550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ducarme, F., Luque, G.M., & Courchamp, F. (2013). What are “charismatic species” for conservation biologists? BioSciences Master Reviews, 10, 1–8.Google Scholar
Ecuador Ministry of Environment. (2010). Management Plan for the El Morro Mangrove Wildlife Refuge. Ecuadorian Foundation for the Study of Marine Mammals (EFSMM). Nature Foundation and International Conservation Ecuador. General Villamil, Ecuador. [Ministerio del Ambiente del Ecuador (2010) Plan de Manejo del Refugio de Vida Silvestre Manglares El Morro. Fundación Ecuatoriana para el Estudio de Mamíferos Marinos. (FEMM). Fundación Natura y Conservación Internacional Ecuador. General Villamil, Ecuador]. Retrieved from http://suia.ambiente.gob.ec/documents/10179/242256/21+PLAN+DE+MANEJO+MORRO.pdf/641cd58c-5c57-4695-bcb5-0aff93c2db7a Google Scholar
Ecuador Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Defense, Ministry of Tourism, Ministry of Transportation and Public Works. (2014). Ministerial Agreement 4. Official record 278 of Jun 30, 2014 [Ministerio del Ambiente, Ministerio de Defensa Nacional, Ministerio Turismo, Ministerio de Transporte y Obras Públicas. Acuerdo ministerial 4. Registro oficial 278 de 30-jun-2014]. Retrieved from http://www.turismo.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ACUERDO-INTERMINISTERIAL-20140004.pdf Google Scholar
Erbe, C. (2002). Underwater noise of whale-watching boats and potential effects on killer whales (Orcinus orca), based on an acoustic impact model. Marine Mammal Science, 18, 394–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Félix, F., Calderón, A., Vintimilla, M., & Bayas-Rea, R.A. (2017). Decreasing population trend in coastal bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) from the Gulf of Guayaquil, Ecuador. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 27, 856–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Cegarra, A.M., & Pacheco, A.S. (2017). Whale-watching trips in Peru lead to increases in tourist knowledge, pro-conservation intentions and tourist concern for the impacts of whale-watching on humpback whales. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 27, 1011–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gastwirth, J.L., Gel, Y.R., & Miao, W. (2009). The impact of Levene’s test of equality of variances on statistical theory and practice. Statistical Science, 24, 343–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genovart, M., Tavecchia, G., Enseñat, J.J., & Laiolo, P. (2013). Holding up a mirror to the society: Children recognize exotic species much more than local ones. Biological Conservation, 159, 484–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasser, M., Holt, N., Hall, K., Mueller, B., Norem, J., Pickering, J., & Peters, K. (2003). Meeting the needs of rural populations through interdisciplinary partnerships. Family & Community Health, 26, 230–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, S.E., & Collins, S. (2013). Livelihood responses to mangrove deforestation in the northern provinces of Ecuador. Bosque, 34, 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Home, R., Keller, C., Nagel, P., Bauer, N., & Hunziker, M. (2009). Selection criteria for flagship species by conservation organizations. Environmental Conservation, 36, 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyt, E., & Iñiguez, M. (2008). The state of whale watching in Latin America. WDCS Chippenham, UK; IFAW, Yarmouth Port, USA; Global Ocean, London. Retrieved from: http://uk.whales.org/sites/default/files/whale-watching-latin-america.pdf Google Scholar
International Whaling Commission. (2006). Report of the scientific committee. Journal of Cetacean Research and Management 8(Suppl.), 1–65.Google Scholar
Ip-Soo-Ching, J. M., Zyngier, S., & Nayeem, T. (2018). Ecotourism and environmental sustainability knowledge: An open knowledge sharing approach among stakeholders. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 35, 62–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karagiannis, S., & Apostolou, A. (2004). Knowledge management in eco-tourism: A case study. In Karagiannis, D. & Reimer, U. (Eds.), Practical Aspects of Knowledge Management. PAKM 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3336. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30545-3_48 Google Scholar
Kessler, M., & Harcourt, R. (2013). Whale watching regulation compliance trends and the implications for management off Sydney, Australia. Marine Policy, 42, 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkby, C.A., Giudice, R., Day, B., Turner, K., Soares-Filho, B.S., Oliveira-Rodrigues, H., & Yu, D.W. (2011). Closing the ecotourism-conservation loop in the Peruvian Amazon. Environmental Conservation, 38, 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobori, H., & Primack, R.B. (2003). Participatory conservation approaches for Satoyama, the traditional forest and agricultural landscape of Japan. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 32, 307–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, T.H. (2007). An ecotourism behavioural model of national forest recreation areas in Taiwan. International Forestry Review, 9, 771–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levene, H. (1960). Robust tests for equality of variances. In Olkin, I. (Ed.), Contributions to probability and statistics. Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lim, T.S., & Loh, W.Y. (1996). A comparison of tests of equality of variances. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 22, 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littledyke, M. (2008). Science education for environmental awareness: approaches to integrating cognitive and affective domains. Environmental Education Research, 14, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusseau, D. (2005). Residency pattern of bottlenose dolphins Tursiops spp. in Milford sound, New Zealand, is related to boat traffic. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 295, 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusseau, D. (2006). The short-term behavioral reactions of bottlenose dolphins to interactions with boats in doubtful sound, New Zealand. Marine Mammal Science, 22, 802–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, H.B., & Whitney, D.R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, 50–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meissner, A.M., Christiansen, F., Martinez, E., Pawley, M.D., Orams, M.B., & Stockin, K.A. (2015). Behavioural effects of tourism on oceanic common dolphins, delphinus sp., in New Zealand: The effects of Markov analysis variations and current tour operator compliance with regulations. PloS One, 10, e0116962.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mello, I., & Amundin, M. (2005). Whistle production pre-and post-partum in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in human care. Aquatic Mammals, 31, 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monroe, M.C., Andrews, E., & Biedenweg, K. (2008). A framework for environmental education strategies. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 6, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nachar, N. (2008). The Mann-Whitney U: A test for assessing whether two independent samples come from the same distribution. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4, 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National System of Protected Areas (NSPA). (2018). Ecuador Ministry of Environment (EME). Sistema Nacional de Áreas Protegidas del Ecuador (SNAP). Ministerio del Ambiente Ecuador (MAE). Retrieved from http://areasprotegidas.ambiente.gob.ec/es/reporte-de-visitas# Google Scholar
North, C., & Hutson, G. (2011). Environmental myopia: The case for bifocals. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 27, 229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowacek, S.M., Wells, R.S., & Solow, A.R. (2001). Short-term effects of boat traffic on bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, in Sarasota Bay, Florida. Marine Mammal Science, 17, 673–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunes, M.E.R., Franca, L.F., & Paiva, L.V. (2017). Efficacy of different strategies in environmental education teaching: association between research and university extension. Ambiente & Sociedade, 20, 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, S., Campbell, R., Cortez, H., & Knowles, T. (2009). Whale watching worldwide: Tourism numbers, expenditures and expanding economic benefits, a special report from the International Fund for Animal Welfare. Yarmouth, MA, USA, prepared by Economists at Large, 228.Google Scholar
O’Neill, J. (1992). The varieties of intrinsic value. The Monist, 75, 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orams, M.B. (1997). The effectiveness of environmental education: Can we turn tourists into ‘Greenies’? Progress in Tourism and Hospitality Research, 3, 295–306.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, K. (1896). VII. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution.—III. Regression, heredity, and panmixia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character, 187, 253–318.Google Scholar
Pearson, K. (1900). X. On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 50, 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pekrun, R. (1992). The impact of emotions on learning and achievement: Towards a theory of cognitive/motivational mediators. Applied Psychology, 41, 359–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RStudio Team (2016). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. Boston, MA: RStudio, Inc. http://www.rstudio.com/ Google Scholar
Schuler, A.R., & Pearson, H.C. (2019). Conservation benefits of whale watching in Juneau, Alaska. Tourism in Marine Environments, 14, 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, P. (2000). New environmental theories: Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 391–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sevillano, V., Aragonés, J.I., & Schultz, P.W. (2007). Perspective taking, environmental concern, and the moderating role of dispositional empathy. Environment and Behavior, 39, 685–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanee, N., Shanee, S., & Horwich, R.H. (2015). Effectiveness of locally run conservation initiatives in north-east Peru. Oryx, 49, 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, S.S., & Wilk, M.B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52, 591–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, M.A. (2011). Community engagement in higher education (Doctoral dissertation, UGA).Google Scholar
Stephenson, M. (2011). Conceiving land grant university community engagement as adaptive leadership. Higher Education, 61, 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szamado, S. (2008). How threat displays work: species-specific fighting techniques, weaponry and proximity risk. Animal Behaviour, 76(5), 1455–1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trave, C., Brunnschweiler, J., Sheaves, M., Diedrich, A., & Barnett, A. (2017). Are we killing them with kindness? Evaluation of sustainable marine wildlife tourism. Biological Conservation, 209, 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walpole, M.J., & Leader-Williams, N., (2002). Tourism and flagship species in conservation. Biodiversity Conservation, 11, 543–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmer, A., Ogden, L., Lawton, J., Sturner, P., Groffman, P.M., Schneider, L., & Bettez, N. (2010). The engaged university: Providing a platform for research that transforms society. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8, 314–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcoxon, F. (1945). Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin, 1, 80–83. doi: 10.2307/3001968 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R., Hedley, S.L. & Hammond, P.S. (2006). Modeling distribution and abundance of antarctic baleen whales using ships of opportunity. Ecology and Society, 11, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01534-110101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, C., & Tisdell, C. (2003). Conservation and economic benefits of wildlife-based marine tourism: sea turtles and whales as case studies. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 8, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, A., Khalil, K.A., & Wharton, J. (2018). Empathy for animals: A review of the existing literature. Curator: The Museum Journal, 61, 327–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar